User talk:Chryzziri

Recent edits to Pia Wurtzbach
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pia Wurtzbach, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jacona (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding fancruft to the article, Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not Pia Wurtzbach's Facebook page. Thomas.W talk 14:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I do not think you should have marked this edit as "minor". The edit that you marked as "minor", reinstated (without an explanatory edit summary) material that had already been removed (with explanatory edit summaries) more than once by more than one (eg: Thomas.W, JaconaFrere, BushelCandle) separate editors.
 * After reading Help:Minor edit, where the nutshell currently states, do you still think you should have marked it as minor? BushelCandle (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Your recent editing history at Pia Wurtzbach shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Edit-warring to add back material that had been removed by multiple editors for being unencyclopaedic fancruft. Thomas.W talk 09:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)