User talk:Chubbles/Archive 5

Blessthefall
You warned me, even though I corrected wrong information on their page. Blessthefall is not screamo. Screamo is described as bands such as Pg.99, Orchid (band), and Saetia. Blessthefall is post-hardcore.

p.s. What you said about Green Day being punk is completely retarded. They are clearly pop punk and VERY different from Crass in both sound and attitude. The musical elements of both are entirely different as well. I highly suggest you watch the documentary about Crass, titled There is No Authority But Yourself. Anyone who calls Green Day "punk" does not have the slightest idea about what punk is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.206.144.229 (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Paging Mr Chubbles
Hi Chubbles

I haven't seen you around recently, hope you are well and enjoying the holiday season.

We have a DRV ongoing where some TLC and help with sourcing from someone who is good at alternative music might be able to help greatly. Any chance you could have a look and see what sourcing you can come up with?

Cheers Spartaz Humbug! 07:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I too hope all is well. I cited you at DRV here and am looking forward to seeing what you are up to next. -- Suntag  ☼  18:24, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My post at DRV wasn't a request for your involvement in writing Love Systems. It was a message to Coaster7 that if s/he continues on a path of rescuing troubled articles, s/he could become another noted article rescuer, like Chubbles. : ) Good to hear that all is well with you. -- Suntag  ☼  13:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Dear Chubbles, I am trying to clean up the entry on Robert deMaine, classical cellist, and would appreciate any help and advice you might offer. You have my immense gratitude for any assistance! Mr. deMaine's niece, while well-meaning, has edited the article ad nauseam under the moniker 'rdemaine.' Mr. deMaine would rather have the article completely deleted than to have this version in cyberspace. Regards, Fgrabowska (talk) 21:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

CSD for User:Jasonmmisner/Black Hammock Band declined
Hello there. I've declined the speedy deletion of the above article, as it's in a user sandbox and as such is likely to be in a temporary and incomplete state. Should you still fill it's appropriate for deletion, I would encourage you to list it at WP:MFD. Many thanks,  Gazi moff  17:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Ted Jensen
I'm sorry, but you must have read this one wrong - this isn't close to A7 territory. Can I please have it restored? Chubbles (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * OK. I re-read it and you may have a point. Restored. -- Alexf(talk) 20:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Camel peer review
Hello, how are you? Since you were one of the main editors in bringing Guinea Pig to FA status, I was wondering if maybe you could please review Camel, which I have just brought to peer review with the hope to get ideas to eventually give it a GA candidacy. Thank you. -- Fish-Bird (talk) 17:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

A Rocket to the Moon
I wasn't sure so I've taken the matter to Deletion review for discussion. Theresa Knott | token threats 21:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * On a related note, I highly doubt that the DRV will be closed in a way that restores the article. Would you like it userfied for you instead?  Cheers, man.  lifebaka++ 16:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Sources for record labels?
I've been wanting to write an article on a record label for a few weeks now (wanting meaning I haven't put any effort into it... yet) and I was just wondering if you knew any good places to search for sources about one. Google is so far being... Somewhat less than useful. Cheers, man. lifebaka++ 19:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The label, Locomotive Records, produces a lot of power metal, thrash metal, as well as some epic metal and other hardcore genres. They've been active for the past 11-12 years, and started in Madrid, Spain.  Thanks for your help, and sorry it took me a while to respond.  lifebaka++ 18:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Gospel Hummingbirds
I have nominated The Gospel Hummingbirds, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Gospel Hummingbirds. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. flaminglawyer 05:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Ildebrando D'Arcangelo
Hullo Chubbles,

Was about to proofread the article above - does it need to be proofread? The article's translation is marked as complete on the translation page but it hasn't been updated on any of the translation project pages. Could you please let me know? Thanks! Francesco Campelli (talk) 20:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
 You're invited to the Seventh Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup March 15, 2009 Time: 3:00 PM RSVP (view/edit this template) This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Aware Records
I can't work it out either. I mean, the policy on leads is pretty clear. If anything, the work he's done there has been to lessen the quality of the article as it was when I created it. I don't know, I'll head over there again and see if I can talk sense with the guy. Peace. -- rm 'w a vu  00:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

God is an astronaut
Hi there, I see you re-added the upcoming unnamed album release. We can disagree if it's encyclopedic or not. I'm not going to take any further action, but I would recommend you add a source. Fair enough? Thanks  Nelson50 T  18:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Last Dayes of April
The entire article read:


 * Last Days of April is a band from Stockholm Sweden. Their music crosses the genres of rock and pop as found on their latest album 'Might As Well Live'.

Spartaz Humbug! 22:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Crystal Stilts
A tag has been placed on Crystal Stilts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. --  Darth Mike  ( join the dark side ) 03:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Doing some research on my own, I've withdrawn my nomination. --  Darth Mike  ( join the dark side ) 03:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

His Boy Elroy
Hi Chubbles,

I am new to all of this and signed up because I want to chat with you and thank you for creating the His Boy Elroy page. (I was in the band.) Thanks,

Pls reply, sorry if I have not spoken correctly Stumpy55 21:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stumpy55 (talk • contribs)

BrokeNCYDE
User:Chubbles/Ncyde Spartaz Humbug! 08:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Crash Romeo
A tag has been placed on Crash Romeo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez  Get to know me! / Talk to me! ←at≈:→ 20:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Parker (guitarist)
The above was protected because (as Stifle said) a spammy fanblurb "article" under that name had twice been created by s.p.a. User:Scofosho5. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeff Parker (musician)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jeff Parker (musician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No evidence or assertion of notability; fails to meet WP:MUSIC, as far as I can tell

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If I'm wrong, let me know. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Jay Hoggard
Chubbles,

Im not sure if this is the right place to ask this. If not im sorry. I thaught text that appeared on the web could be copied onto wikipedia. Is it ok if I use this same information and put it into my own words? If not how do I show that I have permission to use the text from the copyright holder?

Jamalh23 (talk) 20:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)jamalh23

AfD nomination of Jeff Parker (musician)
I have nominated Jeff Parker (musician), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jeff Parker (musician). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  04:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
 You're invited to the Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup March 15, 2009 Time: 3pm Location: Drexel University RSVP (view/edit this template) In the afternoon, we will hold a session at Drexel dedicated to discussing Wikimedia Pennsylvania activity and cooperation with the regional Wikimedia New York City chapter.

Are events like a Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia in our future?

In the evening, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local Italian restaurant. This has been an automatic delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Joel Futterman - help please
Hi Chubbles - You obviously work very hard on all these pages. I'm working with Joel Futterman on changing his Wikipedia entry. Each time he or I try to make essential corrections, you are deleting them. Can I please make changes to his page? He is concerned because Wikipedia comes up so near the top when his name is googled and it is currently inaccurate. Thanks - Karla —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjz (talk • contribs) 20:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Joel Futterman
Thanks for your understanding - Karla —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjz (talk • contribs) 20:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Chubbles - Thanks again for your response. Joel Futterman's MySpace was not done by him, but put up by a fan, so we'll just skip that since I don't know where the content came from. I've asked Futterman to send me corrections to the bio area and I'll post those soon, without a massive rewrite, and while keeping your formatting and links in place. - Kjz (talk) 01:27, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Regarding The Maine
Hi, I'm leaving this message in regard to your edit to The Maine (band). Is there any reason you re-linked those bands? As far as I know, there is no policy advising a against redlinks, but IMO, they're unattractive and unnecessary. Unless you can give me a policy or a reason for it, I'm going to unlink those links again. Thanks for your time. Soba Noodle For You 04:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. I know a lot better now thanks to you. Soba Noodle For You 00:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Crystal Antlers
A tag has been placed on Crystal Antlers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nuttah (talk) 20:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your note. I think you are correct that the page did not satisfy criteria for speedy deletion; I apologize for having missed that.  I went ahead and restored the page per your request.  Let me know if you have other concerns.  Best wishes, --TeaDrinker (talk) 00:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chris Hill (DJ)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chris Hill (DJ), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability per WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC, even in the given sources, which mostly fail WP:RS.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. edg ☺ ☭ 12:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Dakota Moon
We generally don't include Adult Top 40 Tracks or Top 40 Mainstream charts in discographies, as they're component charts of the AC (I think) charts. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 04:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * According to this, Hot Adult Top 40 Tracks shouldn't be included in discographies. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 18:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

warning templates?
Hi- I'm wondering why you didn't give a vandalism warning template to this user? Just curious. tedder (talk) 19:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Original barnstar

 * I edited the article on one hit wonder A'Me Lorain, and I noticed the massive volume of musician's article that you've contributed towards. You deserve a barnstar for the incredible effort that you've put into Wikipedia!  Royal broil  04:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, I did most of the article on The Gufs. That's not why I gave you the barnstar! Like I said I noticed that you started A'Me Lorain's article (I heard her song on Sirius radio today). I expected to find either no article or a stubby garbage article - not a short but well-referenced article. I'm AWED by the number of articles that you've worked on for musicians! You do give a damn!  Royal broil  04:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Tragic Hero Records
Just curious, why do you think this label needs an article? There are only a small handful of bands that are/were signed to Tragic Hero Records with articles on wikipedia. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I read the article in Alternative Press - it was less of a full page article and more of a short seven question interview with the CEO. It was really only a half page since the top portion was just a picture of the CEO. I could try to get you a scan if you have seen it yourself quite yet. I know that this is a newly formed label (formed in 2005 according to the article) and it seems to have potential. Since, at this point, the label article would not be too much more than an intro, an infobox and a list of bands, and probably would not quite meet notability guidelines, there are a few other things you might be able to do. You could create category pages for Tragic Hero artists and/or Tragic Hero releases. You could also start an article for Tragic Hero Records as a user subpage and keep it there until it meets notability standards. I was thinking about doing that with a few upcoming artists myself. Fezmar9 (talk) 19:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

If not busy, care to look at this list of potentially notable albums?
Hey there Chubbles. Was wondering if you would be kind enough to look at this list. I am not asking you to create articles for all those albums (you do whatever you want!:) ) but I figured that since you are quite obviously a music buff/expert, you would be able to work out whether those 15 albums are notable enough to be placed as articles on Wikipedia or should just be mass redirected to each of the corresponding singers/bands. Cheers!Calaka (talk) 04:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That is fair enough. I guess some might argue that the album info (records sold, track listing etc.) can be just placed on the artists page (in a subsection) though (but then again, that should apply for albums of all artists, and not just the lesser known ones). Ah and don't worry about that (articles getting deleted). The article count for wikipedia is only going up (10 million by 2030?) and the quality will likewise follow. Do not get yourself down. I and I am sure much of the music community of Wikipedia would hate to lose an individual such as yourself. Cheers!Calaka (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

"Seriously? It's 2009 and this is still, and always has been, a redlink?"
I know how you feel. There're plenty of pages I want to make on subjects that I'm surprised are still red links. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 03:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Montanas
A tag has been placed on The Montanas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Δnnuit  Cœptis  03:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy
I disagree with your removal of the speedy, so I re-added it. I've done that many times before, and I don't usually get complaints. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 02:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I've said why I think it's an obvious hoax in the afd discussion. I really don't understand why so much crap like this is basically forced to stagnate at AFD for a week or longer. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 02:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Matt Keating (musician)
Can you please restore this article as notable based on this, this, this, this, this, and this? Chubbles (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Please go and improve the article. No guarantees another editor might tag it for deletion. -- Alexf(talk) 10:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

You're invited...
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Angst (U.S. band) Wiki entry
Hi Chubbles. First off, 'Thanks!' for caring enough to write something about the band Angst. That said, I had made some revisions, correcting and adding some info and noticed that you almost immediately changed my entries back to your original post, for the most part. I'm wanting to avoid a constant back & forth if possible, so I wanted to give you a heads up that I'll be changing some things back again (and adding things, now or later), as there are *HUGE* factual errors on the page. For example, Angst was NOT from Colorado, but San Francisco - the Instants and Angst were two different bands that shared members. How am I so certain of this? I was in the band(s)!

Anyway, again, thanks for your effort - I'm only trying to make what you started better!

Anonbox (talk) 01:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Region of Shaba
An article that you have been involved in editing, Region of Shaba, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frozenguild (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Chubbles, thanks for taking Category:Fast Folk artists to DRV and helping it to get another debate. -MrFizyx (talk) 22:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hoots & Hellmouth
A tag has been placed on Hoots & Hellmouth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Page protection
Dammit, you beat me to the page protection on Attack! Attack! and I didn't know until my Twinkle form submitted :-) tedder (talk) 15:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Call me crazy, but I'd be pretty excited to hear a genre called "crabcore". William James had a famous quote about crabs being fiercely individualistic... Chubbles (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

The reason for removing "emo" and "screamo" from Alesana's page
GO look at wikipedia's own definitions for the genres. And the listed bands for screamo, you can tell that Alesana doesn't fit there. Plus, they were not sourced, so the Truth was is all I have to rely on —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.224.34 (talk) 04:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia's definitions are not reliable sources. It is the nature of this project to be inconsistent and self-contradictory, since it is cobbled together by thousands of people with varying degrees of expertise. Regardless, Alesana plays screamo, among other things, and this is now sourced (though the whole business of sourcing genres, I would argue, is a waste of time). And there we are. It's phenomenally fatiguing to fight about this; you are one of thousands of people who repeatedly make genre changes to popular band pages. I wish that you would find a more constructive way of spending your time here. Chubbles (talk) 04:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Skeet skeet
I'm curious as to the meaning/purpose of this redirect, as this phrase does not appear in the target article. (I'm not familiar with the song the target article is about, so maybe I'm missing something obvious...) Beeblebrox (talk) 01:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Not sure how to message you?
I would like to create more stubs, but not sure how to start and would love to talk to you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwasifrye (talk • contribs) 23:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. It's a content dispute, not vandalism. Onorem♠Dil 17:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know of a templated warning for this situation, but "vandalism" warnings are for intentional disruption, not for silly arguments over which genre a band may or may not fit into. Unless there's a history of this particular editor repeatedly ignoring consensus on the issue, this is a simple content dispute. --Onorem♠Dil 20:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

I am working on a pet project that tracks hiphop and r&b musicians (and executives) there are few notable executive (award wining) and new artits that don't have wiki bios
Thanks for replying, I am working on a pet project that tracks hiphop and r&b musicians (and executives) there are few notable executives (award wining) as well as new artists that don't have wiki bios, but have song played on the radio. I would like to be able to add people but have apparently been doing everything wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwasifrye (talk • contribs) 20:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again! Should I mention references to the person in other Wiki articles? Does that help at all? I notice you have done a huge amount of the music updates, thanks alot! Do you have a blog or site? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwasifrye (talk • contribs) 22:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

The Bruces

 * The article I deleted was not about a music group; it began "The Bruces are a well known guild in WoW (World of Warcraft)". Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Black Lab
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Black Lab/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Cab Kaye
Hi Chubbles,

a friend and I are working on the translation of the dutch version on the article on Cab Kaye. We would really appreciate it, if you can check it every now and then for Wiki consistency. Thanks in advance, --NorbertvR (talk) 21:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Chubbles,

I think we have most info on Cab Kaye added. It would be great if you can check the wiki compatibility. Thanks in advance,

--NorbertvR (talk) 00:08, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring?
Gee, thanks for the warning regarding a supposed edit war INVOLVING YOURSELF. One could argue that you are edit warring as well. 98.220.27.165 (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Steeplechase
A list with redlinks is not advised, because these artists do not have proven notability, which is necessary for their inclusion is such a list. The category is much more useful and encourages new articles. The more cats an article has, the better. Cosprings (talk) 00:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Press kit photo
If you don't mind me asking... How am I supposed to get the Hoots photo(s) from my hard drive to wikipedia? They're the property of the band, and they wish to use it on their wikipedia page. Legality and (technical) ability are different things though haha... I thought that the press photo upload would be appropriate to use, maybe something else is more suited for this occasion? Thanks :] Willofmdr (talk) 20:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

A small thanks
Hi, I would just like to let you know that I appreciate your little correction to my userpage. I often overlook that kind of grammar and it's somewhat of an instinct for me so just a little thanks. FireCrystal (talk) 03:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Band genres
My change was certainly legitimate and you cannot base how I will edit this site in its entirety on two minor edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woundedlocust (talk • contribs) 19:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Margie Rayburn
Well done for creating the article. I couldn't find a great deal at the time so just redirected it to something she was associated with until I could have a better look. I've just found a very useful biography which gives birth and death dates and some background information so I'm going to add it. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 13:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Millionaires (band)
Hi! I agree that Millionaires should have an article. Actually, they already do. :) There's one you can check off.

Thanks for reverting the last name removals on Dance Gavin Dance & Breathe Carolina! You're pretty dedicated to the music articles. talking birds  22:28, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Barry de Vorzon
Hi! I was just looking at your edit to Barry De Vorzon, and I was curious what you meant by "revert copypaste" - yes, User:Sbarie wrote some badly formatted POV text, but what does that have to do with "copypaste"? Thanks! &mdash; QuantumEleven 08:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Your Googling skillz are far greater than mine, for I didn't find that website. OK, now I understand where you're coming from, thanks for your vigilance! &mdash; QuantumEleven 12:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Deletion Policy
Re: your message -

I have reviewed it. Obviously I believe them to be eligible for deletion. If I'm going about it improperly or if there is a specific instance of something I've proposed for deltion not meeting the criteria for deletion please be specific. Let me know and I'll be happy to correct it. I'd value the direct input anyway. What is it that I've tagged that is not eligible for deletion and why?

Thanks for the input. Etrangere (talk) 07:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Noted.. I will instead request citations.  Etrangere (talk) 07:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Deletions
If you are going to police my proposed deletions - please provide some reason why an article should not be deleted on the discussion page.

Thanks Etrangere (talk) 07:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Bee in the Bonnet
I have no issue with discourse between editors. I accept your comments though I think we disagree in general and that could be causing friction. I don't think Wikipedia should be the repository of every band you can think of. I think it's noble but redundant. Not every band who got a mention in the local rag should be given a page in an encyclopedia. It's clear music is your passion and you have extensive knowledge on the subject but it seems over-kill to put every band you can think of on Wikipedia even if it's a one sentence article. Don't you agree? Maybe you should actually develop articles beofre placing them on Wikipedia. That's what your sandbox is for. After a while the compulsive number of hapless entries is just turning the music project into static.

I disagree with using Allmusic as a source for citation. Yes - it's a valuable source of "information" but not a valuable source of editorial content. It therefore shouldn't be used to cite references. Also - I don't think a bands own web-site or a DVD should be cited.

Ultimately there is nothing I can do to curb your current zeal for maintaining and posting articles from bands at the local pub, but chances are I won't stop proposing many changes to them. I really have to ask you respectfully to improve the quality of your article citations and sources. Quality over quantity my friend.

By the way - you made a couple of good points in your comment to me. I'll improve my tagging of your articles with improvement templates that are more appropriate.

Etrangere (talk) 18:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:
Well, it's unfortunate to hear that you have so little respect for what I use encyclopedias for. At the time I started, this project was woefully sparse on virtually every aspect of music I could think of - particularly jazz music, where thousands upon thousands of noted jazz musicians went unremarked upon. (This is still the case, but primarily for jazz musicians in non-English speaking countries; compare the German wiki's coverage in jazz.) I can't really see much merit in your argument that it's just cluttering things up or "overkill", since the same could be said for any subject - minor military figures or journalists, for instance.

Wiki still has yet to catch up even with major published music encyclopedias. The articles I write aren't on bar bands - though there are a few admitted bar bands I wish I could write articles about...but the ones I am writing on, I'm adding because they achieved some sort of recognition beyond the local pub.

I write stubs and don't often expand much upon them precisely because there was, and is, so much to do. I saw it as sort of planting seeds - creating a substrate for others, including anons (who can't write articles), to work on. Noting what was missing and definitively proving that it belonged here was the most efficient way to use my time. Why not quality and quantity, after all? I don't spend much time expanding things now because I am trying to stop being on this website so much.

As for DVDs, I think it depends on the material; Son Volt, for instance, released an album in 2005 with an additional DVD of interviews, and I think that's a fine resource. Were you referring to the DVD mentioned in The Cats? That's not really a source, more of a footnoted comment. Doesn't really matter to me if it's there or not, if it bugs you I don't mind you reformatting it or removing it. As for Allmusic - they have a raft of well-known authors (Richie Unterberger, Stephen Thomas Erlewine, Scott Yanow) and have published dozens of music encyclopedias. The site has long been accepted as a reliable source, and if you wish to contest that, you would probably want to start a centralized discussion somewhere. I'm happy to discuss issues with individual citations, if you think their information is wrong, but if you think the cite should be blackballed, well, I can't help you there.

Back to work, then...cheers Chubbles (talk) 18:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

...You're not really doing this, are you? I write this nice, long response to you, and find out when I'm done that you've gone and prodded a dozen articles on composers I wrote! This isn't a personal issue, and I don't want to make it one. Please, stop and think about what you are trying to accomplish here. Chubbles (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)\


 * I am. You're right.  It's not personal.  Please improve the articles I've tagged for improvement, or wait until I or someone else does before removing the templates placed there.  I'm not placing them there for giggles.  The articles need to be improved.  What's the problem with that?  Did you really believe your one liners to be complete?


 * I don't have a lack of respect for you, or the gargantuan efforts you seem to have put in at Wikipedia. I think it's true that there are many articles that you've posted that needed posting.  I also think there are many that you've posted that should be excluded.  Having said that - I now have a better understanding of what you're trying to do = planting seeds.  I must say though - you've planted many thousands: Maybe it's time to start expanding them.


 * I have to relent with regard to Allmusic. I'm able to accept it as a source of editorial content since you've made that point so well.


 * Don't get personal Chub. My article about a journalist and "minor" military figure is unfinished, and in my sandbox (for development).  It's also well cited and sourced.  Not to mention the fact that I hardly think a person who accomplished the things noted in the article (and yet to be noted) is comparable to a band from XYZ town who got mentioned in a local newspaper.  What do you think?  Do you think his accomplishments make him minor?  Interesting.

Defensive aren't we?

Etrangere (talk) 19:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

User: Imaplanet
I have blocked the user indefinitely for WP:BLP violations. The info that he/she added needed to be verified by a reliable source (i.e. the news media). I messed up on the template on the user's talk page and quickly fixed the template message. Hopefully, he/she will understand why we do not allow original research. Willking1979 (talk) 16:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Userfication
The article is at User:Chubbles/beast. Hope you doing ok. Spartaz Humbug! 03:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

absurd genre discussion
Can you take a look at Talk:Nightwish? tedder (talk) 06:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Guinea Pigs
Hi, I thought I should let you know that I left a message about your revert of Guinea pig at User talk:71.147.42.143, just in case you get a message from them. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 23:35, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I was trying to be encouraging to a new user so they didn't feel that their carefully crafted paragraph had been rejected without thought. To show that they could ask for help and assistance even from the editor who had cut their work. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 23:45, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I can see why you removed it. I don't think it had anything new in it. I just know that kids do something they think it great, an adult removes it and then pages are being blanked and rude words are written. I didn't want them to feel that those wikipedians with their funny names were unnapproachable and out to get them. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

User talk:12.173.19.186
Hey there Chubbles, thanks for your work dealing with this user. But don't forget that user's are allowed to blank their own talk pages (in most cases), so be sure not to revert it as you did here. Best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 14:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S. The blocking admin (Master of Puppets) has now removed the user's right to edit the page, so you shouldn't be getting any more trouble :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 15:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There are only four things that a user shouldn't remove from their own talk page; declined unblock templates (while blocked), sockpuppetry templates, shared IP header templates, and MfD templates. You can read Don't restore removed comments for more info (although that is a essay, the actual guideline is at WP:BLANKING. Best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 15:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, IMO, if a user wants to remove their own unblock request (before it is acted upon) they should be allowed to. Anyway, I'm not trying to tell you off or anything, and I don't mind that you reverted, I'm simply letting you know my thoughts. By the way, I noticed after a cursory look at your contribs that you do a bit of vandalism removal, have you ever considered requesting WP:ROLLBACK? - Kingpin13 (talk) 16:12, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

question
I question the move of "The Shells" to the disambig page "Shell". There are from what I can see only two entities that are "The Shells". And one of those (the modern band) is much more searched for than the other (a band from 60 years ago). So I thought the way that it was before was appropriate. Certainly if any one band member is searched for, they would be a "Shell" ... so it is fine for "Shell" to have a reference to the bands at the bottom. But a search for "The Shells" should, if I understand correctly, lead to the band that is far-more-searched, with a link at the top to the band of lesser current interest. Thoughts?--Epeefleche (talk) 19:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. I see that you also changed the name of the band from "modern" to "folk".  I tnink that modern is the most helpful way to distinguish it from the band from 60 years ago.  And "folk" is a mischaracterization -- if you wanted to go the long route I would suggest "pop/folk rock harmony trio" (perhaps harmony could be dropped).  But "folk" clearly is not sufficient IMHO.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Seven-String Guitarists
Then why are the bands Unearth, Flaw, Lacuna Coil, Through The Eyes Of The Dead, Adema, Taproot, Mushroomhead, Within Temptation, and Nevermore on there?

-hsxeric (talk) 23:04 October 3, 2009

re: Here we go again
I've reverted the user's vandalism, attacks/vandalism are fine to remove of course. Also, I saw you reported the user, note that the user is unlikely to get indeffed, as IP accounts change (i.e. in a year someone else might have that account), but the longer the account vandalises the longer the blocks get, so it can get up to a year or even more in some cases. Best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Dorothy Allen
I don't think this was what you were looking for Spartaz Humbug! 18:28, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Dorothy Allen was born in Andover, Hampshire, England on the 4th of September 1988. Since that day she has had many adventures. She currently resides in Bath, Somerset, England and holds two official titles:


 * ‘The most beautiful and perfect person in the world’


 * ‘The most loved person ever in the world’


 * She is also leader of the kingdom of Bathwickshire and is humbly served by her devoted boyfriend Daniel Gradwell. The very same Daniel Gradwell that did not know what love was till he met her.

Bands and BLP
Hey there Chubbles .. nice to meet you. anyway ... I started a thread here. Don't know if we can get some feedback or not, but worth a try. I'm open either way, but I think the BLP stuff strains the servers a bit at times, just IMHO. Cheers and best ... — Ched : ?  21:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Deletion_review/Log/2009_October_8
Hi Chubbles Any chance you can help this editor out rescuing this article? Spartaz Humbug! 16:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Your IP address
Try this site for your IP address. Dr Dec (Talk)   17:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Keith Kennif
Done. Jayjg (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Danyel Gérard
I have nominated Danyel Gérard, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Danyel Gérard. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Gazi moff  13:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Steeplchase
Chubbles, red linked articles are not part of the list; they are not yet notable.

Also, you don't even know how to correctly link articles, or include a YOB category/living persons, or include record label categories (Patti Drew), or the 2000s music groups category Ancara (band), just trust me and don't revert SC Records again! Cosprings (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Please visit Talk:Twinz.
signed: Qlazarus (talk) 07:48, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
NJR_ZA (talk) 20:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Bios
Chubbles, you're obviously a good and informed editor, however your biography articles are missing the major categorization of year of birth and living people (or year of death). Every biography article should have these at the very least. Beyond that, see Category:Artists by record label.

Cosprings (talk) 17:28, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Okay, but you seem to pay attention to "what links here", categories are the only other criteria for a well-linked, and exposed, article. If you better categorized articles you've already wrote, they would be in much better shape by now.

Cosprings (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Edits to Scene
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scene, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. &mdash; Deontalk 15:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)