User talk:Chubbles/Archive 6

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheo
A tag has been placed on Cheo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 01:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Daddy
An article that you have been involved in editing, The Daddy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --  At am a  頭 19:51, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Chubbles! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 11 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Vladislav Sendecki -
 * 2) Ed Wynne -
 * 3) Henk Wijngaard -
 * 4) Margot Eskens -
 * 5) François Bourassa (musician) -
 * 6) Victor Bouchard -
 * 7) Alejandro Núñez Allauca -
 * 8) Akira Miyoshi -
 * 9) Adam Brand -

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

User:Chubbles/The Helicopters
Voila! Spartaz Humbug! 03:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Automatic Man
Glad you saved the article. Please let me know how you like my revisions and best wishes. Catherine Huebscher Catherine Huebscher 09:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Discussion invitation
Ikip 05:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Refactored this message a bit. thanks, hoping to hear from you. Ikip 17:49, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Bobby Rydell
Yes, I am aware of the 'Bubbling Under' chart. BUT, when the sub heading states 'Billboard Hot 100' and the attached citation so refers, it is nonsense to slate #113 (or whatever).

Frankly, the US charts systems are geared to ensure that everyone has a chance of appearing somewhere, on some listing or another. If I farted "Baa Baa Black Sheep" out of tune, I would probably get a mention on the 'Not Farting "Baa Baa Black Sheep" in Tune Chart in Chicago in January 2010 (in a hailstorm) (at midnight) (on a Saturday) Mega Blazing Hot 10,000,000 chart'. Sorry - rant over. The real point is you, me and the other sub editor, understand 'Bubbling Under'. A more casual reader may not and think; how does a #113 hit appear in the Hot 100. A cited reference to another recognised chart listing needs to be stated. Otherwise the door is open to all sorts of spurious chart claims; rather like my earlier comment. I am not trying to dissuade other editors throwing in their own efforts, but there is a need for consistency.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Athenaeum (band)
Good undo accompanied your. It looks like is a spammer for BBlessing and its book Athenaeum, BBlessing. TJRC (talk) 17:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
 * 1) Proposal to Close This RfC
 * 2) Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip  02:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Notability
Please add something to Lee Circle indicating why it is notable ... and different than Lee Circle in Richmond, Virginia which does not rate an article. And possibly some references? Regards, Ariconte (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Mikołaj Zieleński
Hi Chubbles,

What's bugging me is the "(dates unknown)", rather unhelpful in a lead. "Mikołaj Zieleński was a Polish composer active in the early 17c" would be acceptable. cheers, Sparafucil (talk) 06:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Dâm-Funk
I have nominated Dâm-Funk, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dâm-Funk. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Pritzker
Fine. I added a source. There should be no excuse for maintenance tags dating back to May 2007. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I DON'T KNOW...
Chubbles, i don't know who you are or who you THINK you are but you keep deleting facts that i continue to insert on your All Together Separate page. I'm not sure why you do this...clearly you don't know as much as you think and all your little "degrees" and "diplomas" don't necessarily prove anything, but i would appreciate it if you would leave my revisions and additions alone. grow up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twiztid214 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Ropeadope
Hi, I would love to provide you with a copy, but I don't know how to do so in this rare case. The article about the soap dispenser was redirected into the boxing technique. I'll try, but no promises. If I can't do it, can you post the query to another admin? Bearian (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, the history is here and the AfD is here. Bearian (talk) 15:51, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I don't have access to that. Try a WP:CHECKUSER. Bearian (talk) 21:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Hatnote
HATNOTE says, "Hatnotes should not be used for articles that do not exist since the notes are intended to point the user to another article they may have intended to find." Therefore, there shouldn't be a hatnote on the other Harlow Wilcox until he has an article too. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the snark, too. Obviously I don't take edit wars well. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rock n Roll Worship Circus
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Rock n Roll Worship Circus. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Rock n Roll Worship Circus. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Request for history
I found Requests for undeletion, which is a place you might want to go to. Bearian (talk) 13:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Idea for the 2 Steve Reid jazz drummer dilemma
I saw your edit on my watchlist --> you could call one Steve Reid (jazz drummer) and one Steve Reid (jazz percussionist). Another alternaltive is to use their middle initials or middle names in the title. Just a thought. Have a nice day--Hokeman (talk) 00:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

The 1985 change deletion
I noticed you deleted my changes to The 1985's page, citing 'vandalism.' As the singer and guitarist of that band, I have no interest in vandalizing my own group's entry. I only wanted to clear up some falsehoods, bad writing, and 'rock journalist' jargon the entry originally included.

I re-posted my changes, and hope they stay this time. Please contact if there's a problem. cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvernetjr (talk • contribs) 21:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm unsure how I can libel myself
Is that even possible? As for sources, which would you like pictures or medical records? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvernetjr (talk • contribs) 14:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Millionaires (band)
You're right; the article wasn't eligible for speedy deletion. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I've restored it. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:52, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

The 1985 (again)
Please stop undoing my revision, as I'm attempting to make it comply with the rules you forwarded to me. There is no reference saying that we played with anyone. Furthermore, who we did a split release with is insignificant.

I try to make changes to be in compliance, you continue to delete these compliant changes with no reason. Any reasoning given to me is contradictory (you say that you have no way of knowing if I really was a member of said band, then you tell me I shouldn't make revisions because I was a member of said band. Which is it?),

I simply attempted to make changes to a terribly writen, bad jargon filled, and inaccurate entry improving the site you moderate, and I'm met with borderline harassment (and that border is rapisly being crossed).

I hope the next revision I make will be my last

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvernetjr (talk • contribs) 22:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Louis Cottrell, Jr.
Hello, amazing work you're doing in the Jazz genre. I've expanded the article you created 5 times, Louis Cottrell, Jr., in the hopes of getting it nominated for Did You Know. I wanted to ask you, how do I move this Talk:Louis_Cottrell,_Jr./workpage to here Louis Cottrell, Jr.? Thanks! Lionelt (talk) 09:17, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestion. I'll paste it in there presently. I wasn't able to enter any footnotes for this source: Mike Hazeldine, "Louis Cottrell, Jr."  Grove Jazz online. Could you put a quote on the talk page when you have a chance.  Thanks Lionelt (talk) 07:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Scott Colley here. I think I now understand why you have been undoing my edits, and am in the process of re-doing my biography. I will replace the one written by Bill Milkowski in the next day or so. I was confused by your comment probable copyvio though. I don't understand what you mean. Copyright violation? Please let me know. Thanks, Scott Colley SColleyAS (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Hello... I do not know if this is the correct place to state this, but i have been trying to edit the Gus Black page with new info, and omit information that is not as importantt o me.. I am Gus Black. i think i should be able to have a say in what goes on my page. That being said, i will try to include some of the previously written info. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ifonlyreally (talk • contribs) 01:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Codf1977 (talk) 18:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Re:Eulogy Recordings and Ferret Music
-  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 18:26, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Bizzy Bone
Hey, Can you find a ref for the Bizzy Bone being a Sumerian Records artist? Not that I don't believe you, I just thought if there had been one I wouldn't have removed it and maybe that would be true for others as well. Cos it is, well, pretty unbelievable haha Cheers, The Flying  Spaghetti Monster!  17:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks. I only asked because a quick Google search didn't really throw up anything reliable. Cheers, The Flying   Spaghetti Monster!   —Preceding undated comment added 10:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC).

Articles for deletion nomination of Secret Trial Five
I have nominated Secret Trial Five, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Secret Trial Five. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 14:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Good catch thanks
Good catch thanks, Ill fix that thanks. Let me know if you see anything else. --Kumioko (talk) 18:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Silvertone (Selfridges)
Thanks for your support at the Articles for Deletion/ Silvertone Records. Too often editors are too apathetic to take the time to save articles beyond their own interest.smjwalsh (talk) 11:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Tintern Abbey
Hi Chubbles! Recently I've been working on the Tintern Abbey article, all I was trying to do was adding inline references, but I figured that the article was not written chronologically, so I replaced the sentences a little. While looking for references, I've noticed some of the facts stated there have no source available online. I'll be adding citation needed templates for those I couldn't find any reference. If you have books and such, it would be nice to add references for them. Have a nice day. ~ Elitropia (talk) 12:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the information Chubbles. Then, I'd suggest to keep the citation needed flags until a reliable source is found, if not, delete the unsourced material as per WP:BLPEDIT. Have a nice Sunday. ~ Elitropia (talk) 07:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Skeet skeet listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Skeet skeet. Since you had some involvement with the Skeet skeet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:33, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

About Conjunto Primavera discography
Do not put the numbers that has been in Billboard, and do not put the compilations! I know the real discography, a good discography does not include compilations, you can only leave the studio albums and the live albums. Do not leave compilations because they are not important, and the numbers are not important unless each disc has been their own article. And De Gira Con Conjunto Primavera 2 is real,dont errase,and dont errase 30 Aniversario. --Arruina cumpleaños (talk) 21:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

By the End of Tonight
Should you wish to start a new article, I found these: --Michig (talk) 16:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Allmusic
 * Pitchfork
 * Pitchfork
 * tinymixtapes
 * Drowned in Sound
 * Dusted
 * Noise Magazine
 * Houston Calling (points to award for Best New Act in the Houston Press Music Awards).

Just Us
Hi Chubbles. I happen to be a Chip Taylor fan, but aside from his presence in this brief duo and its brief recording career, I am curious why you think it is notable? Cheers. Cloonmore (talk) 04:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right, my bad. Thx for the reply. Cloonmore (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

The SteelDrivers
Saw your little editwar here. I found a source saying Stapleton's not in the band anymore; he was replaced by Gary Nichols. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Joe Maini
Hi, Chubbles

My reason for changing the reason for death on the Joe Maini page; After reading an article on the all about jazz page "The Truth About Joe Maini" or http://www.jazzwax.com/2010/06/the-truth-about-joe-mainis-death.html Where there is an article quoting Tina Maini.

(Renzo167 (talk) 15:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC))

WP:COMPREHENSIVE
I apologize in having unintentionally made the first sentence of your userpage no longer accurate. :-) --Cyber cobra (talk) 04:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC) (By way of WhatLinksHere)

Title blacklist
It'll be the blacklist that's preventing you from creating K-the-I??? because of the multiple question marks. If you want to draft a start (a sentence or two) in your userspace, I can move it for you, but it won;t let non-admins create it and there's no easy way of getting round the blacklist. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
 Nolelover  It's football season! 19:45, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Sic Alps
I've restored per your request and tidied a little. Can you take it from here? --Stephen 22:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Alternate vs. Alternative on music articles
Cmdrobot has been correcting "alternate version" to "alternative version" on music articles, per a guideline which favors British English in general for this variant. However, "alternative" has a specific meaning in popular music (see alternative music), and the bot's last few dozen edits show at least several cases of this correction being made on articles by alternative rock artists. Naturally, this is quite confusing (e.g., on Starlight (song), where "alternative versions" makes it sound like the band has recorded the songs in that particular genre, rather than being a separate take or mix). This grammar fix should be nixed for music articles, or should be corrected by hand. Chubbles (talk) 21:05, 18 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh no! That particular interpretation of the phrase hadn't occurred to me. I'll remove the 'alternate version->alternative version' rule from the bot, and go back and fix up/revert those edits. Thanks for letting me know. CmdrObot (talk) 21:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Gottlieb credits
I have linked Gottlieb's name in some of the photo credits when appropriate, such as when the photo is specifically listed as being taken in Gottlieb's office, but the article should discuss Gottlieb if the photo credit is to be included. That's why I quoted WP:CREDITS in removing a raft of Gottlieb credits in jazz articles. The relevance should be made plain; the connection between the artist and the photographer. If the only mention of Gottlieb is through an image credit, no connection is established. WP:CREDITS requires relevance, and relevance must be established. Binksternet (talk) 19:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Album articles
Per Elen of the Roads, I've placed a ot of article albums, such as User:Chubbles/Spine and Sensory into your userspace. Happy editing. --Courcelles 00:17, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Defleshed
JamesBWatson (talk) 11:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

The Civil Wars
Tx for that article ... good new band.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

The Civil Wars
Tx for that article ... good new(ish) band.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rustix


A tag has been placed on Rustix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

I can't see how a #170 hit makes them notable.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Feel free to drop a line on my talkpage if you would like to discuss the matter further.--85.210.22.156 (talk) 22:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK
Hi. I've nominated Rebecca Black, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. BabbaQ (talk) 12:35, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

saw your article on myrchent
I was looking at the backlog for the requested articles and saw the myrchent and after googling the name I found your page and i thought that the page was pretty complete and was wondering why you haven't moved it to the main directory. Icallitvera (talk) 01:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Rebecca Black
The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Hardcore band prods
Hey, as you've probably noticed there was a user who PROD-ed about 20 hardcore bands in the space of about 20 mins, yet all of them were notable. He/she even PROD-ed Sick of it All, which I find amazing. The scale of the PRODs within the short time frame suggests that this user did not do any research before tagging the articles; I mean, the majority of them even had Allmusic bios and had released multiple albums on notable record labels, easily passing our notability criteria. I'd normally send a very strongly worded message to the user telling them not to waste my time removing all their tags, but this user seems incredibly experienced, with over 30,000 edits. Is there anything that can be done? doom gaze  (talk)  16:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Nice work on my "Slik Toxik" goof
Even though I have run across this one ("Infact") several times and avoided changing it, this time it got past me somehow. I have now added a "Proper name" template to it to avoid a similar goof by me or by others. Happy editing! Chris the speller yack  02:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Brother Reade for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brother Reade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brother Reade until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Terri Quaye


A tag has been placed on Terri Quaye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 23:57, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Kirtland Records
The images in the gallery just got OTRS permission and you may be viewing the cached copies from Commons. However, an editor to that page has a conflict of interest since they represent the company being discussed in the article. – Adrignola talk 21:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tadd Mullinix


The article Tadd Mullinix has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tadd Mullinix


The article Tadd Mullinix has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 23:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Removal of WP:BLPPROD tag.
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 15:52, 25 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Chubbles, SunCreator is correct, BLPPRODs are not "remove at will", there are strict requirements for their placement and removal, if you'd like the tag removed, simply add a single reliable source. Unlike regular PRODs, there is no limitation on their reuse.  --joe deckertalk to me 15:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Replied to your note at my talk page, thanks. --joe deckertalk to me 15:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of En Nuestro Desafio


The article En Nuestro Desafio has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NALBUMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 11:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Troop 41 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troop 41 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Troop 41 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Frank &#124;  talk  02:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mexican Summer


A tag has been placed on Mexican Summer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Alexf(talk) 01:38, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Alvin Hayes
Chubbles, every time I see your edits I get confused. If there's no article for this Scott Carter, then why include it? I saw the personal for that album, and there are zero notable musicians. Why include him only?Cosprings (talk) 18:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Nat Stuckey
You reverted a POV rewrite back in March. The editor came back and placed it in again. Turns out it's not a copyvio, but I've rewritten it again in a more acceptable tone. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Sean Deason for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Deason is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sean Deason until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 19:23, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Louis Cottrell
As I recall the grandson wasn't named "III." One of those New Orleans Creole things. I suspect the IP knows the grandson and will revert. I don't think we ned to make a big deal about this. I have a source somewhere from when I expanded the article. I'll try to find it. – Lionel (talk) 23:02, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

The Myrchents
Have you seen The Myrchents? See also User_talk:Coin945. Pam D  08:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Robert Page
Hey, so I noticed that you are a prolific author of articles about music and musicians. I saw your talk page list of things that should have articles but do not, and I just wanted to let you know that choral conductor Robert Page is someone who most definitely falls into this category. SeanMD80talk 22:33, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I looked him up on Grove Online and he doesn't seem to be listed. However you can find a bio here: . SeanMD80talk 18:23, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

A heads-up
You placed a mergeto on Intertwingularity. But you did not:
 * 1) place a corresponding mergefrom on Ted Nelson;
 * 2) initiate a discussion on Talk:Ted Nelson explaining why you think the articles should be merged.

When instantiated both mergeto and mergefrom tell readers that they can find a fuller explanation on the talk page of the target explaining the merge. Some contributors simply excise these tags when the tag placer has failed to explain themselves.

In my opinion if a topic is worthy of a wikilink, it is worthy of its own article -- provided there are WP:RS to support it. Ted is a genius, who coined key terms, like hypertext, virtuality, intertwingled and teledildonics. IMO each of these key terms deserves a separate article.

A google search shows that while Ted may have coined the term it is widely used by others, which I suggest substantiates it should have its own article. Readers may come to the wikipedia who are not interested in what the term meant when Ted coined it, but who are interested in how it is used now. Geo Swan (talk) 20:39, 29 December 2011 (UTC)