User talk:Chuchunezumi/Archive 2

Kate Richards O'Hare
What is your justification for including Kate Richards O'Hare's picture in Lesbian American history? 66.177.207.173 06:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Did you happen to read the article or just look at the pictures? She wrote one of the few accounts available regarding lesbianism in early American history, and where her picture appeared, there is a substantial portion dedicated to her writings. Chuchunezumi 09:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
How very kind of you! I wish I had more time on my hands and that my health permitted more editing and vandal-busting now. :( Chuchunezumi 20:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Just when I thought that nothing can embarrass me any longer - now I am embarrassed. Thank you, I did not know anyone was watching. Haiduc 19:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Lesbian American history
I asked my friend, Atom to take a look at the article, and I see he has made some changes, and is also still pondering some. I'll be in touch with him in the next few days, and I expect we'll approve GA status. Appraiser 05:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Help me?
As embarassing as this is, I can't seem to delete my "on short wikibreak" banner without the formatting of my user page being altered. Could someone with better skill in this area be so kind as to remove it for me? Thanks a million! Cheers! Chuchunezumi 23:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * What it looked like before:, what it looks like now: I can't see any formatting errors, let me know if you can  &mdash; D e on555talk desk  23:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * No worries. let me know if you need anything else – D e on555talk desk 00:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Boston molasses disaster
Thank you for you input on Boston molasses disaster - I will make adjustments as per your comments. Markco1 17:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks much!
Wow, my very own Barnstar! I'm honored, thank you so much, Chu! I'll keep an eye on the Lesbian American history article and maybe add some things once you've had a chance to rework it. Peace. :-) Textorus 16:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Graham
Hi, I took a quick look and was put off by that snide blog quote at the top of the article. I would simply say that there have been insinuations (footnoting that statement, see also [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/wickham/2002-12-09-wickham_x.htm here) and that he has neither confirmed nor denied the issue. As it is now, it is totally unencyclopedic. Haiduc 10:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Substitute certain templates!
When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Squirepants101 03:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Blanking user talk pages
Regarding this edit, what you said isn't true. Editors are not obligated to leave anything on their user page, certainly not after replying to the message. It isn't vandalism and you cannot be blocked for doing so. See Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/Removing warnings. Guettarda 15:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)