User talk:ChuckG92

History Detectives
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 07:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:B17fcapturedintactbytheluftwaf1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:B17fcapturedintactbytheluftwaf1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC) If Wilipedia used Sanskrit, it would be easier than this archaic 1980s coding nonsense! The photos are clearly vintage and they're from US DoD files (captured German photos).

Wikipedia needs to have an interface friendly to experts in fields other than computer code!

ChuckG92 (talk) 00:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Typhoon MKIB nazicaptured.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Typhoon MKIB nazicaptured.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd love to note the sources, but I read your means by which to cite this public domain source, and frankly, I don't have the time to major in a computer language at this time. This is NOT a user-friendly interface!

00:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Spitfire MkIX nazicaptured wartimecolour.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Spitfire MkIX nazicaptured wartimecolour.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 01:21, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I have seen article after article with counter points. What I wrote is OBJECTIVE and states the "qualifications" of the hosts which is not disputed by anyone. Placing this into the statement is completely formal.

Need I point out the tons of articles I have read with very, very, very biased and often incorrect information?

Why do you have such a vested interested in protecting this from even the most mundane of exculpatory evidence?

PS Why is Wikipedia such a closed community, with these Draconian edits, instance on 1980s coding. Is this an encyclopedia by and for programmers only??

ChuckG92 (talk) 09:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)