User talk:Chuckcrkt

December 2019
Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Coup d'état—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Everedux  (talk)  22:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Coup d'état. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:24, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

The addition I made was constructive. It is completely accurate to the definition already listed. Chuckcrkt (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Coup d'état, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 00:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

I added an accurate definition. Why are you repeatedly deleting a legitimate addition? Deleting an accurate addition is not constructive. It's actually counter-productive. Chuckcrkt (talk) 00:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

I haven't disrupted anything. You are needlessly censoring me.Go fuck yourself you fascist prick. Trump 2020 Chuckcrkt (talk) 00:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 00:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)