User talk:Chumammeka

Proposed deletion of Chuma Mmeka
Hello, Chumammeka. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Chuma Mmeka, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Chuma Mmeka to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Rberchie (talk) 08:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chuma Mmeka


A tag has been placed on Chuma Mmeka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanielRigal (talk) 21:38, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Infobox writer/doc. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Further: using misleading edit summaries is considered disruptive. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)