User talk:Chunckymonkey

November 2007
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. NeutralHomer T:C 23:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. —C.Fred (talk) 00:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * There's a difference between "dude," which is a slang term, and "scum," which is attack language. Not to mention the edit summary/section heading of this edit of yours.  —C.Fred (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

There seems to be a flaw in your reasoning. I said that I appologized for that edit and that it caim out and slipped and i was sorry. That was that. What I am mensioning here is the interactions between me and that Homer guy w/e his name is. He was harassing me. I was not blocked for the edit to Luna, and as I've said, I am sorry for that and stopped after the warning. And then I was blocked for harassing the HOMER user, which I DIDN"T. I do not like being called dude and he onpurposely called me dude just to get me upset. And you can tell that by his edit history when I made that comment telling him not to and then right after he puts as his edit summary quote, "dude". So get your facts strait. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chunckymonkey (talk • contribs)  The preceding text was stripped out of a repeated, and thus invalid, unblock request.


 * During which interaction you made the "scum" remark. In the absence of the f-bomb you dropped on Luna Santin, I probably would have told you to just let it go with Neutralhomer and get on with constructive editing. Because of the combination of the three elements—the comment to Luna, the remark to Neutralhomer, and the continued talk messages to him—that's what got you blocked. So no, I didn't block you directly because of the comment to Luna, but it was a contributing factor to the block. —C.Fred (talk) 00:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wherever You Are (film)
An editor has nominated Wherever You Are (film), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)