User talk:Chunkycheese

Image tagging for Image:Animals.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Animals.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox next time. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 02:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

May 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Steven Adler. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Prolog 20:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Considering that your proposed biography of a pornographic star deals with a 14 year old, and that the picture you provide is a candid shot, I have difficulty believing WP:FAITH. If I'm wrong, please let me know. --Milton 04:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Karoliina yang
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Karoliina yang, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Karoliina yang fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: vandalism attacks on non-notable To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Karoliina yang, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Karoliina yang itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kyang.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Kyang.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Kyang.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Picture put on for the sole purpose of calling the person in the picture a porn star To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Kyang.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Kyang.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Outrageous malicious edit. One more and you will be blocked.DGG 07:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Monte Scholz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TheRingess (talk) 21:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)