User talk:ChurCuz

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Beccaynr (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello. Your recent edit to Hutt International Boys' School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Why did you make this revert?
? I need an answer. Doug Weller talk 21:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I have no answer to give you. ChurCuz (talk) 22:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Well that's a shame as it's a violation of the CT alert above. I can see no reason not to topic ban you from the area, or at the very least give you a nice long block. I'll think about my choice for a while. Doug Weller  talk 08:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * A block for a revert of a talk page? You’re kidding me right? I only wanted to read it. I don’t see how this is a violation in anyway of Contentious topics I haven’t once edited about the conflict in Palestine if you’d have bothered to check my revision history. If you wanna block me for that then I am GONE from here never to return if that’s the kind of thing that would get a user blocked. ChurCuz (talk) 12:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You couldn't be bothered to tell me when I asked? And you had no right to revert, but you could have read it by looking at at the history and viewing the unreverted page. I'll give you a pass this time as it looks like you may not understand that simple thing. Just be more careful in the future. Doug Weller  talk 13:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Understood.ChurCuz (talk) 14:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

 * Was talking on Scientelensia’s talk page just now I’ll now disengage. I accept this. ChurCuz (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll have a look but no worries; you clearly hadn't seen this yet. I might revert your edits though, not as ban violation but as unproductive. I'll have to see what you wrote. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * (done, collapsed. Thanks for pointing it out and for your understanding. And do feel free to remove these notices unless you'd like to keep them as a reminder to yourself. None of this is meant to be a wall of shame.) &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 22:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * , the ban includes reverting edits made by, or responding to them, such as done at Darwin Núñez. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I’ll revert them ChurCuz (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * (I forgot to add diffs, diff 1, diff 2)
 * No need, I already did so, but thanks for being willing to undo them yourself. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Never mind noticed you’ve done so. Should I just completely never edit that article again since I’d imagine Scientelensia will return to that article after their block? ChurCuz (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's probably best to stay away from Darwin Núñez and similar articles. &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Right. No problem ChurCuz (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Trouted
Trouted for a warning template for the wrong person. That happens to everyone  My real namm  (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 22:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * A badge of honour. ChurCuz (talk) 20:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)