User talk:Church/Archive 5

Question about references
Hi, Thanks for dropping by on my talk page. I do have a question for you actually. I am trying to use the same footnote multiple times, but I can't get it to work. Do you know what I am doing wrong?

The citation in question:

and I am trying to call it back by, but the preview gives a warning: Citations with no name can't be empty.

Edit: you can't actually see them on your page, doh. You can in edit mode though.

Also, anyway to save your work in progress without submitting it? I made some changes to the article, but I am only half done and submitting it now would just look weird.

Thanks for any response! Yoenit (talk) 22:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, the Cite seems to be in order have you tried just copying and pasting it? Also if you want it to show up you can use the Insert non-formatted text here  tag, which I've used above.
 * And no, there really is no way to save your text in mid-edit and come back unless you wanted to create a sandbox in your userspace, but I'd advise against it if it's actually an article that'd be edited before you had finished your changes. Hope that helps. Regards, -- SKATER  Speak. 22:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, my error was using a \ instead of / in the recall it seems. I have another question, but I will test out the helpme template to avoid cluttering your talkpage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoenit (talk • contribs) 09:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about cluttering up my talk page, feel free to ask any questions you want :)-- SKATER  Speak. 16:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

MW
Hey, I wonder if you'd take a look at my comment on AN about MisterWiki. You offered to support my RfA, so I'm guessing you trust me, would you be willing to trust me on this? HJ Mitchell |  Penny for your thoughts?   20:12, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * does this answer your question?-- SKATER  Speak. 22:02, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, if he's unblocked, I won't let you down. Thanks, HJ Mitchell  |  Penny for your thoughts?   22:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

???
What were u talking about on the Vandalism Noticeboard STATicVerseatide (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:STATicVerseatide) 06:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * With the helperbots down every user was removing the blocked, I had taken a shift and was removing them but got tired of waiting to see if the vandal you reported was blocked or not.-- SKATER  Speak. 15:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Do u know if he eventully got blocked? And r the hyperbots back up cause another IP is doing the same thing the one i reported was doing and idk if im going to have to report him too STATicVerseatide talk 19:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 76.197.247.56 was blocked for 31 hours, and unfortunately no, The bots still aren't back up I dunno what the deal is with them.-- SKATER  Speak. 19:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Usually what happens with bot outages is someone pushes a change to the live version of MediaWiki that slightly alters some output or formatting the bots look for. -- King Öomie  14:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Previously Unmarked Section
Thank's for the welcome skateboard dude.--SharkWarning Simon (talk) 07:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem...Just test in the sandbox from now on :).-- SKATER  Speak. 07:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

IP vandalism and ANI
Aye, I wasn't sure if you were asking me or people in general, hence my note about not being an admin - though I realised later that I'd then appeared to ask you a range-block question in return - indenting ain't easy ;-)

Regarding not being an admin, no, it's true, I'm not! I've not felt up to it in the past, and right now I'm just returning from a 6 month wiki-break, so I don't feel up for it now either. Maybe in the future, but maybe not... thanks for your kind comment though!

Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 18:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Indenting is sort of like Godwins law, the more indents there are, the more likely it seems that someone thinks the other is an admin. Thanks for your assistance so far :). Regards,-- SKATER  Speak. 20:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

RE: Adoption
Hi Skater! If you want, I would definitely be up for adoption. Thanks! :) -- MithrandirAgain   (Talk!)  22:47, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adopting me! :) -- MithrandirAgain (Talk!) 01:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've asked you a question on your talk page, please answer them when you get a chance :).-- SKATER  Speak. 23:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello! I am sorry I didn't respond. I've been running around in RL, doing things I'm behind in. Anyway, to answer your question, I am unsure how to answer. I've been using Wikipedia for years, but only last month did I start editing. There are some things I am not 100% proficient at, such as copyright laws, so I always read the Wiki-copyright page before I write anything. I usually lurk in the Recent Changes area, watching for vandals with the help of Twinkle. I am working on a Bot in spare time, and hope to have him up and running soon. Other than that, I can't think of a question or concern this second, but I am sure I'll think of something. Thanks again! :) -- MithrandirAgain (Talk!) 02:07, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'm sorry your my first adoptee so this'll be a learning experience for me as well. I guess to start off, do you have any specific questions I can answer?-- SKATER  Speak. 02:38, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Article Writing
-- White Shadows you're breaking up 19:55, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Re. ANI, helper
You made me think of this :-)  Chzz  ►  03:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, thanks for putting the smile on my face :)...I think I'll go make some tea now actually.-- SKATER  Speak. 03:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

What can I say?
I just got a feeling. It's like spider sense for vandal accounts. (Yes I know what sarcasm is, too.) Half Shadow  02:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * lol, I was just afraid some editor who can't read even the obvious sarcasm would find me to be an idiot....-- SKATER  Speak. 02:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Re-your message- Radio23 image use
Hi

I've listed the author as Radio 23 as it was created by the staff of Radio 23 who have given me permission to use the image in the public domain. As they will be sending me an image with a better resolution with which I will replace this one, please tell me what I should do if listing the author of the image is not good enough? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiedorczuk (talk • contribs) 13:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The file you uploaded neither has an author nor a license that specifies the permissions that go along with it's use. If you can provide both of those things (and assuming you do have the permission to use it) it will be fine. Regards,-- SKATER  Hmm? 14:08, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi

The author is Radio 23, they have given public domain permission as stated in the file page- what more do I need to do? Sorry, quite new to wiki so please be patient if I am doing something wrong here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiedorczuk (talk • contribs) 14:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Just go into the [the file] and edit the table you have to specify the Source, author, and Desciption. Right now you have not done any of the following. Then you must add the License, and add for the license, asssuming he really did add it into the public domain Also, please sign with your posts with the four tildes ( ~ ) or hitting the signature button. Thanks-- SKATER  Hmm? 15:26, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your support at my RfA
Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 17:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Re-Hacker.jpg
uploaded and specified PD - I think (I hate Wiki's interface, I have no idea if anything works) - I personally created the image from a screen cap of the FPO title-card, and put some style treatments (texture), cloned art (wall extension), and typography.Although it is an original piece of art (found-art assemblage) since the source only makes up a small fraction of the rest - I'm not into locking down copyrights on collages and would like anyone to use / modify. Please revert the flag or do whatever voo-doo this user-hostile interface site does. Thanks.
 * I'm new to the world of images on wiki, so I may very well be mistaken myself, but right now are you saying you wish to release it into the public domain?-- SKATER  Hmm? 21:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes it should have been from the outset - didn't see the pull-down. Uploaded and specified PD on the pull-down the second time - STILL don't see the damn PD badge. I have no idea what the hell to do - but my story hasn't changed. I made it, anyone can use it. Enjoy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgabrys (talk • contribs) 21:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * , added the public domain tag and removed deletion tag. This appears to be it's own form of art and not a screen cap from something that was copyrighted. -- SKATER  Hmm? 22:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Now the image is missing - what the hell is going on!?

Don't sweat it. You people are confusing. I'll post it on Flickr (less-conflicting). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgabrys (talk • contribs) 23:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * First, Wikipedia is not a place to show off your images. You could use a site like Deviantart or Flickr if that's what you wished to do, but this is an encyclopedia. As I told you, their was a chance I could be wrong and this just turned out to be the case, according to my mentor Fair use rationale. I apologize fore my mistake, however.-- SKATER  Hmm? 23:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

If it's "my" image - how can it be a copyright violation? I don't have time to explain copyright law today (I work in publishing). Thanks for the heads-up and attempts to fix tho even if the outcome was balderdash.
 * If it's your image then you just have to specify your the copyright holder. Have a look at WP:DCP, it'll tell you what to do.-- SKATER  Hmm? 01:52, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Huh? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 22:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, misclicked too fast and undid it. My bad. -- SKATER  Hmm? 22:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Ping!
Check your email! Nor rush. :) HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Re:Exams
It's all good. Best of luck to you!! -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 04:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey!
How are you my friend? When you have a moment, I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at User:HJ Mitchell/Oily Peacock and sse if there is something there to be salvaged. I saved it from a BLP PROD by userfying it to my userspace, but I can easily zap it if it's not worth keeping. All the best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, I just joined the HALO Wiki project. I was wondering if you would like to read a Halo fan fiction that I made? CJISBEAST (talk) 16:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2010
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anthony Armstrong (musician)


The article Anthony Armstrong (musician) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable musician that fails WP:MUSICBIO and has been tagged as possibly not meeting notability guidelines for five months.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 03:51, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I happened to see this and de-prodded this since you seem to have retired. I don't really understand why someone who spent so much time on here would retire completely, if there were not attempts to compromise their identity. Retiring from the kind of stuff "your crowd" seems to do is one thing - the "vandal-fighting", etc - but there's always new knowledge to contribute, isn't there? Then again, I believe in this study here: http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia ... There needs to be less "fighting", less "us vs them", less editing wikipedia for "badges" and "ego" and "administratorship", and more collaboration and things like that. Wikipedia needs to encourage a lot more casual contributors - and it should be the job of 'experienced' people to help them along, not make their life more difficult. (e.g. fixing "needy edits" Recent changes patrol) Luminifer (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Admin Coaching
Hi Skater, just wanted to let you know that I've decided to put your admin coaching on hold as I'm now mostly retired from Wikipedia. If you return to editing actively again and are still interested in continuing with admin coaching, please do let me know. Although I am retired, I'm still absolutely committed to finishing what we began. All the best,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 21:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Anthony Armstrong (musician) for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Anthony Armstrong (musician), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anthony Armstrong (musician) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Aspects (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Expand
Template:Expand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 22:58, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2010
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 03:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2011
–MuZemike 14:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on WP:WQA, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Gerardw (talk) 21:54, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I am aware of signing posts...just a matter of getting back in the habit of it. Also, WP: Don't template the regulars would have been nice, but no harm done. -- SKATER  Is Back 21:56, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Alex Green
Hello! Your submission of Alex Green at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 21:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, I appreciate the barnstar. When I nominated my first article for DYK, another editor was kind enough to point out my mistakes, too, and most of the DYK regulars are always glad to help. - PM800 (talk) 00:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It's appreciated, I'm not big on content creation but this one wasn't near as bad as I thought it would be.-- SKATER  Is Back 00:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like you already fixed the template to show the review, as it looks fine now. And just to let you know, you only need to review another article if you have five DYK credits already :) A lot of rules, I know. Thanks anyway. - PM800 (talk) 01:14, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No, there's nothing else you need to do but wait. Every approved nomination goes to the main page unless someone finds a problem with it, which obviously I don't think will happen. I'm guessing your hook will appear on the main page in about 12 days. - PM800 (talk) 06:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for your help! I'm writing my second DYK as we speak, Davon House, I'm stunned that so many notable college players with so much information available have stubs.-- SKATER  Is Back 06:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Davon House
Hello! Your submission of Davon House at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Rlendog (talk) 01:10, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Admin Rights
I would like to become an Administrator for Wikipedia. I feel like I can make a huge contribution to wikipedia as an Admin. I would not feel the need to vandalize or misuse my position. Thanks for taking your time to consider me. Uncertianperson (talk) 20:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Uncertianperson, Unfortunately at this time I do not feel that you meet the requirements of Adminship. I understand your off to a great start editing, however you need many THOUSAND of edits. I have 6,000 and I am considered on the low side of experience. Your RFA would close instantly per WP:NOTNOW. At this time I don't feel comfortable nominating you.-- SKATER  Is Back 03:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

I understand, but when you feel I am ready, please feel free to nominate me. Thanks! Uncertianperson (talk) 17:56, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I will keep periodic tracks of your edits, but please understand that gaining the experience to be on admin on this project can take a very long time. Just focus on being a normal editor for now, right about what you're interested in. Maybe expand a few articles for WP:DYK, or get experience fighting vandalism or files, or learn about WP:CSD. These are some of the things I do and I'll be happy to mentor you when you need it.-- SKATER  Is Back 18:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Alex Green
Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for D. J. Smith (American football)
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Davon House
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Considering an RfA
Hey Skater. Mind taking a look at my contributions and giving me your thoughts on a possible RfA? I'm just feeling it out right now, and I'd like to get some input before I actually try for it. You'll notice that I don't have nearly the volume of edits as many others (only around 1600 globally), however I have been a part of the community for a long while now (my first edit being on February 23, 2006). Now there have been time periods in this where I've edited more and edited less as time allows, however I am getting back into the swing of things now! Thanks, and no hard feelings if you don't think I'm quite ready for it. Any input is greatly appreciated! nf utvol (talk) 19:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Another RfA
Hello, Skater,

I am the beginner in Wikipedia, but would like to become an admin sometime, so your kind assistance would be very useful to me. I hope to count on your nomination as I reach the level of edits required by Wiki rules (soon, hopefully) - have only 1500+ edits so far in English Wiki. I will really appreciate your support when I reach the edit number necessary for adminship --Orekhova (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Orekhova, there actually isn't an amount of edits required to be an admin per say. It's just that most people prefer to see a set amount that varies per each !voter. You are right that most people will not support with just 1500 edits, I have near 6,000 and my experience is still on the low side. My best advice is don't rush it, be patient and work on doing what you enjoy on Wikipedia. If you do it well enough, and i can't find any glaring issues you will happily have my support when the time comes. Best of luck. Regards-- SKATER  Is Back 14:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Jason Worilds, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Fullback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Your DYK nom for Ryan Taylor (American football)
Hi Skater, I've reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Ryan Taylor (American football) and there are several (minor) issues that should be fixed before I pass it. Could you see my comments at the nomination page and reply there? Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:58, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll go read what you said now. Chancez are fixes will have to wait till tommorow. Thanks for your time!-- SKATER  Is Back 03:12, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Ping. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Appeal
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation using AWB on 20:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 8 February 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released
Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox -.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2012
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK Question
Hi PFHLai, hope all is well. I was working on an article in userspace for a DYK when It's finally ready. My question is does the 10 day limit count when the article is in userspace and not in article space? Regards, -- SKATER  Is Back 14:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your question, Skater. According to WP:DYKSG, the clock doesn't start till the article gets moved into article space. You can take your time to build your article when it is in your personal sandbox for as long as you need. Hope this helps. BTW, it's 5 days, not 10. Good luck on your DYK nomination. Happy editing. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 02:20, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

About the section header at wt:rfa...
if an idea just struck you, I have to ask, did it hurt? ;-) --- Balloonman  Poppa Balloon 14:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Anytime I think it hurts :p, that particular one was somewhat equivalent from being hit by a truck, then the ambulance that came to rescue me.-- SKATER  Is Back 15:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK reviewing: hook citations
I notice that you're new to DYK reviewing—welcome to the club!—so I wanted to let you know about something you need to include in your reviews. Hook facts must both be included in the article, and be supported by an inline citation. This is one of the most crucial things in a review, along with article size and hook length. You should even check the citation in question: read the source (if available) to be sure it does support the fact.

This was true in Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Stephenson (baseball): although the fact that Stephenson had two no-hitters in his senior year was supported by the nearest inline citation, it didn't mention that they were in consecutive games, so the "back-to-back" portion of the hook was unsupported. In such a case, a request needs to be made for a suitable citation; if one doesn't exist, then the hook will have to be modified. (I made that request this morning, and the author has since supplied a good citation, which now appears after the sentence in question.)

For Template:Did you know nominations/Backmuir Wood, the article never mentions the number "30 acres" anywhere. There are various other numbers, which may or may not add up to 30, but the article doesn't include 30, so the hook can't. It'll be up to the author to decide what to do, though the reviewew can suggest possibilities, including alternate hooks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh ok, I figured I'd be messing up a few times and I'll definitely keep it in mind. This whole process has been interesting on me, being new in not only content creation (as opposed to Vandalism reverting/CSD/Whatever elese) but this DYk. I appreciate your help and I'll keep it in mind. Practice makes perfect right?-- SKATER  Is Back 15:35, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Practice certainly helps. :-) I've been at it a while and I'm still making mistakes or forgetting things, but I'm getting better. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Casey Hayward
Hello! Your submission of Casey Hayward at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:27, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Statements in BLPs that lack reliable sources
Hi Skater.

Regarding this edit that you made, I have some questions.

(1) Is this article a biography of a living person, in your view?

(2) If so, should you consider doing something about the (numerous!) statements that the youtube video was intending to support, not just removing the youtube video link? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm currently working to replace the sources as we speak. Yes Aaron Rodgers is a living person (At least I hope he is, or the Packers are in trouble for next year). You caught me in mid edit, which I am fixing with edits not from youtube. In Hindsight, I probably should have done it in one edit. -- SKATER  Is Back 03:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you, that makes it much clearer what you intend. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, Sorry for the confusion. I've undone myself until I get the sources fully replaced.-- SKATER  Is Back 03:46, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nick Perry (American football)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Intangibles
The definition of intangibles is something that cannot be touched or in this case measured. Leadership is an example of an intangible. Someone's 40 time is very much tangible.--Chicofiesta13 (talk) 06:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Looking in to it, you're right. I should of been using measurables, I was under the impression that the common consensus was for intangibles.-- SKATER  Is Back 07:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Casey Hayward
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your request for nomination
OK, I've had some time to take a look at you and your track record. If I were to see your name at RfA now, I'd support you, but I'm not 100% sure that the larger community would, so here's my advice. Keep chugging along doing what you're doing for another few months, and stay involved in admin-related areas. If you still like it after that time, then go for it and I'll be happy to nominate you. If you were to go now, I'd still be fine nominating you, but if it doesn't pass then it'll be at least 6 more months before you run another RfA. Let me know what you want to do. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 17:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Give me some time to consider it. I appreciate you looking me over Blade! I at least want to wait for the Peer Review and GA review of Aaron Rodgers before I do anything.-- SKATER  Is Back 18:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, look forward to hearing from you. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 18:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Having thought about it, once Aaron Rodgers is a GA, I'd like to go ahead and run. If I don't get it then so what? Adminship is no big deal-- SKATER  Is Back 20:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * All right, sounds good. I'll start working on a nomination statement; you might get a few opposes over your previous RfAs (there are a very few people who are strange about that), but I don't think that should be a major issue.  Your activity level would probably generate the most opposes, but I don't think it'll be a huge deal.  But yeah, definitely finish your GA stuff; RfA tends to suck up a lot of time, even if it goes smoothly.  The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 20:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Third times the charm right?-- SKATER  Is Back 20:42, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Errrrr, ummm, I thought you'd wait a bit. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I am waiting. Once I get a peer review and GA review over with Rodgers it'll probably be a few more weeks. At least I thought so anyways.-- SKATER  Is Back 23:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If you want to run, I would advise you to take at least 3-6 months to prepare for it. If you are planning now, go after 3-6 months and make your profile strong. It is very less likely for you to succeed if you go in 1-2 months from now. Please take it positively, I just advised :) → TheSpecialUser TalkContributions* 14:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I will hold off, seems to be the majority consensus.-- SKATER  Is Back 14:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Recall
Please don't ask RFA candidates if they will be open to recall. It is divisive and unhelpful. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 13:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * How is that divisive and unhelpful when it could change my opinion of whether or not to support the candidate? Regards-- SKATER  Is Back 13:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Please review Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Archive_164,, Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_August_17, and Wikipedia_talk:Administrators_open_to_recall/Archive_3. Hipocrite (talk) 13:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * So from what I've seen with all of those is that there is no consensus on whether or not the question should be acceptable. I'm sorry you found offense to it, but I respectfully have to disagree that it is divisive and/or unhelpful. I believe administrators should be held accountable, and in this system that people find so broken it it the best that we have. I agree with your point, that convincing them to resign is a good point, but other criteria apply and I like to at least have enough good faith that people who passed through the process are at least honest. (Idealistic I know)-- SKATER  Is Back 13:19, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * After further review, and other questions. I believe you're right, my apology.-- SKATER  Is Back 13:55, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Ryan Vesey Review me!  19:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 22:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

DYK for Jerel Worthy
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Nice job, I enjoyed reading it! Of course I'm quite biased towards Packers! Let me know if you ever need anything.  Royal broil  00:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, I noticed about Aaron Rodgers Day - his article should explain that 12/12/12 was selected because he has jersey #12. It's not obvious why the day was selected except to the superfans like us. :P  Royal broil  02:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey thanks a bunch! It actually brightened my day to see someone enjoyed reading an article that I worked on. I shook my head when I saw that the rookies the Packers drafted had such short stubs when there is so much information available. My current project is to try and get all the Packer's rookies to DYK before the NFL season.
 * As far as Aaron Rodger's go, I'll make the changes to it in a sec.-- SKATER  Is Back 16:12, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Aaron Rodgers
I generally don't review an article a second time after reviewing it once, though I do see it looks a lot better now. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:23, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Mike Daniels (American football)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Your signature
Hi, Skater. I am not able to view your signature with my settings. I have been asked to inform you to change your signature. Please see here. Axl ¤  [Talk]  19:17, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Axl, I've changed my signature. I've been meaning to do it for awhile as Windows no longer natively supports the chiller font, but in the mean time I've went back to my first signature. Is this any better?-- SKATER  Speak 19:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No, not really. I can see "Skater", but not "Speak". Axl  ¤  [Talk]  19:35, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh ok, I see what the problem is. it's because you're using an all dark background :p Now I have to find a color combination that's not ugly. How about my Green Bay Packer themed one?-- SKATER  Speak. 16:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think congress just passed a law making anything Green Bay Packers related illegal :) Ryan Vesey  Review me!  19:48, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. It is a little tricky to read but I can make it out. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  20:35, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Repost of Bare Infinity
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 01:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Always Forever (2009).jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Always Forever (2009).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:25, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

You stated your desire to nominate me...
has created an RfA nomination for me. I understand that you aren't actively editing right now, but it may be a week or so before I actually run. If you would still like to co-nom me, you are perfectly welcome to do so. Ryan Vesey Review me!  13:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Aaron Rodgers/GA2
You have made no responses at Talk:Aaron Rodgers/GA2. Please do so soon.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Skater! I see that you are not active currently so I'll try to keep the GA review alive and address all the issues for you. Cheers!  →TSU tp* 14:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Bare Infinity for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bare Infinity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bare Infinity (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:01, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2012
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:46, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2) Your review is required and will be greatly appreciated :)
Hi Skater ! I have started my second editor review at Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2). I will be greatly delighted, thankful and valued to have your review for me regarding my editing and possible candidate for Adminship. I see you also evaluate possible candidates for Adminship as you had chosen to do so on Request an RfA nomination, so do evaluate me too! As you are a experienced and long term Wikipedian so i have asked for your kind review. Take your time to review my editing and give the best review that you can :). Feel free to ask me any questions you would like to on the review page itself. It will be a great honor to have you review me for which I will truly feel appreciated and helpful! I always work to improve Wikipedia and make it a more better place to be for Everyone :). Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page. Happy reviewing!  TheSpecialUser TSU
 * Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2012
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out! EdwardsBot (talk) 00:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation needs YOUR help!
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter
Delivered 00:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Editor Review
I am currently cleaning up the backlog over at Editor Review and I found this in the backlog. As it is no longer posted on the main page at Editor Review, I was wondering if I should remove it from the backlogs and put it to rest or if I should repost it for community review. I will remove it from the backlogs three days from now if I am not given a response.— cyberpower Offline Happy 2013 23:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Belated Happy New Year with a Toast!


~ TheGeneralUser  (talk)  — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A Very Happy (belated) New Year to you Skater! Enjoy the Whisky ~ TheGeneralUser   (talk)  23:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter (4th Quarter 2012)
 The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter

Volume 5, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2012

Previous issue | Index | Next issue  Project At a Glance As of Q4 2012, the project has:


 * 150 Featured Articles
 * 50 Featured Lists
 * 6 Featured Topics
 * 3 Featured Pictures


 * 45 A-Class Articles
 * 555 Good Articles
 * 12 Good Topics

Content


 * Changes to Featured and Good content
 * News items and announcements


 * Feature: "Strengthening and utilizing WP:VGs inter-language links"
 * Interview: Khanassassin

Project Navigation

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list. This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 02:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * VG Project Main pages
 * Main project – talk
 * Project category – talk
 * Portal – talk
 * VG Project Departments
 * Assessment – talk
 * Cleanup – talk
 * Peer review – talk
 * Reference library – talk
 * Newsletter – talk
 * Video game images – talk
 * Video game images – talk

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out! Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Delivered at 12:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2013
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 16:57, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. -- Mdann 52   talk to me! This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2013
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 11:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kevin Dorsey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redshirt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank You
Thanks for the Barnstar!--Yankees10 16:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Re Thanks for the advice
Skater, I am always happy to hear that something I've said here has helped other editors. Keep plugging along. It's editors like you that make WP great. --Mike Cline (talk) 17:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Wow, Thank you so much! It's funny I always feel like I'm the one getting beat on CSD tagging :p. -- SKATER  Speak. 07:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC)