User talk:Chutney2001

Welcome!
Hello, Chutney2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle  Faddle  14:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: See-through graphics (May 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:See-through graphics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:See-through_graphics Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timtrent&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:See-through_graphics reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle  Faddle  14:46, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article
I noticed that your draft article Draft:See-through graphics was rejected on first submission, partially due to a lack of any easily-checked references. I think that your draft material has potential, and encourage you not to give up. I think that the material is potentially notable, though it may also overlap with Wrap advertising and might be better merged into that existing article. If you feel that a separate article is justified, you should be prepared to give good reasons why.

In all Wikipedia editing, you must be very careful to keep a WP:NPOV and avoid a WP:PROMO tone. Watch especially for WP:COI issues.

You may find the article Help:Referencing for beginners useful in learning how to build complete and well-formatted references in Wikipedia, including both offline and online sources. The methods shown in Using refToolbar are particularly handy for enabling efficient cut-and-paste construction of a proper Wikipedia reference. The refToolbar method is very useful, because it uses a simple form to cue an editor to include the most important parameters (for example, author, date, publisher), while it takes care of the formatting details automatically. You can skip the later section in the tutorial, on manually building references, until/unless you need to "look under the covers" to make custom modifications.

I will monitor this Talk page for a while, so you can use it to ask me any specific questions you may have. Also, please note the Help and Tutorial links in the Welcome message above. It takes a while to learn how to edit properly, including the important task of adding references. If you have unanswered general questions about editing, ask them at the WP:HELPDESK. Cheers! Reify-tech (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Feedback
Thanks both for your feedback. I am going to keep going until I get this right.

Yes I understand the feedback that I need more references etc and to demonstrate the subject matter is noteworthy. One of the reasons I want to create the page is to increase the awareness of See-through graphics as a industry/product category. There are lots of references across the web so I just need to pull some together. At the moment I am unsure how to link to other websites in the reference section so I need to learn this.

The comment about the vehicle wrap advertising page is interesting. Yes the pages are linked but See-through graphics is the name of the overall product category/industry, which sits at the top of a pyramid of linked subjects. On the level below you might have the different types of products which can be used to create See-through graphics....perforated window films, non-perforated window films, printing directly to glass etc. Then you have the next level down in the hierarchy for the different applications of See-through graphics. Vehicle wrap advertising is just one of hundreds of different applications. It might be the most common but See-through graphics are also used widely on shop windows, for solar shading/privacy on buildings and I have just returned from Vegas where every other hotel was covered in a "building wrap". Every one of these applications should not have its own Wikipedia page (in my view). There is perhaps an argument to merge the Vehicle wraps page into a See-through graphics page but I think this would do a disservice to the vehicle wrappers who have filled their page with a level of technical detail which is maybe too much for a generic product category page.

I like to compare See-through graphics with the mobile phone which was invented about the same time (yes I know that mobile phones are more ubiquitous!). The mobile phone is the product category (like See-through graphics). There are lots of different types of mobile phone and lots of brands (just like See-through graphics). And there are lots of different applications, e.g. texting, voice calls, mobile internet etc (the corollary to Vehicle wrap advertising).

I hope that helps?

re-submitting See-through graphics page
I have given this another go. I cannot provide web sources for some of the earlier references, e.g. an article of the squash news from 1982 (could I provide a scanned copy embedded in document?). Likewise there doesn't seem to be any reference to Prince of Wales award winners. Again is a scanned document ok?

This article is not intended as a promotional piece. My objective is to introduce a product category which does not have a lot of editorial on the web. I am very happy to remove anything which is considered too promotional.

Your submission at Articles for creation: See-through graphics (June 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Accents was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:See-through graphics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:See-through_graphics Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Accents&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:See-through_graphics reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Accents 19:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Accents 10:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Stratford see-through graphics.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stratford see-through graphics.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.contravision.com/applications/out-of-home-static/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 10:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Bus wrap see-through graphics.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bus wrap see-through graphics.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.apnoutdoor.com.au/products/transit/impact/megaside#modal2271ed15f8ba137a7f4f26c002890817. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 10:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cycle shop external.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Cycle shop external.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 10:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:See-through graphics external view.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:See-through graphics external view.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.contravision.com/applications/advertising-and-branding/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 10:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Squash court see-through graphics.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Squash court see-through graphics.jpg, which you've attributed to http://sofia-squash.com/bg/news/read/%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BA-%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82-%D1%81%D0%B5-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8A%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%B2-%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0-%D0%B2-%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B0. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:See-through graphics external view.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:See-through graphics external view.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:See-through graphics internal view.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:See-through graphics internal view.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: See-through graphics has been accepted
 See-through graphics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=See-through_graphics help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.