User talk:Chuyalex

Why do you keep replacing flagicon with equivalent plaintext? The plaintext is ugly. – PeeJay 19:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It looks exactly the same in the article, but the flagicon template makes it easier for editors to make changes. If you revert me again, I will report you for vandalism. – PeeJay 11:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Marco Bueno for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marco Bueno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marco Bueno until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – PeeJay 18:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Manchester United F.C.
Because the consensus at WP:FOOTY is that we should not include logos on the kit images. The funny thing is that those images didn't even include the sponsor logo, only the kit manufacturer and the club logo. Ridiculous. – PeeJay 00:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Because some people don't care about what others think and do what they feel like anyway. Besides, we can't be everywhere all the time, so there are bound to be some that slip through the net. And then there's the fact that someone has to create the images we use in the articles, and that takes time. Perhaps they just haven't got around to it yet. – PeeJay 22:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)