User talk:CiCi Storm

Andy Six etc
Unfortunately, members of relatively significant bands do not merit their own article on Wikipedia, unless it can be WP:CITE that they are notable for something other than the band they are in. Please see WP:BAND for more information. For this reason, I have inserted redirects to the band Black Veil Brides for both Andy Six and the article which you then redirected Andy Six to, Andrew Biersack. Also, please remember that Wikipedia is not a place for non-factual, non-neutral, and non-encyclopaedic content content. Please see WP:NPOV and also WP:5 for more information. Thanks. Jay Σεβαστός discuss  20:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Andy Six, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Andy Six was changed by CiCi Storm (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90282 on 2011-03-03T21:17:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Biersack with your recent edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Diannaa (Talk) 22:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Some advice
You seem to be having a bit of trouble with your edits. If you use the edit summary to explain what you are doing when you edit a page, it helps other understand your actions. It also stop misunderstandings when things may appear at first to be vandalism. What is it you are trying to do? Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Andrew Biersack with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Marek. 69  talk  00:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrew Biersack


The article Andrew Biersack has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. N o f o rmation Talk  10:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrew Biersack for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Biersack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Andrew Biersack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. N o f o rmation Talk  20:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)