User talk:Ciar/pre-2008 archive

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --TeaDrinker 01:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

HI there!
A fellow Scottish scientist, greetings! You've done impressive work with Immunology, which the Wikiproject has ignored a little. I've added the MCB tag to some of the immunology articles, but I'm sure you'd have a better idea of which ones are out there. Can I drop you a note next time I have a question about Immune-related stuff? I'm a molecular parasitologist who used to work with Alan Fairlamb in Dundee university, what's your academic ancestry? Yours fraternally TimVickers 15:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

P.S. You might be interested in helping out with the FA process of Immune system. TimVickers 19:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Ditto on the great work! Antibody, in particular, is really shaping up nicely. I just have to ask, (in the spirit of anonymity) does your real name "sort of" rhyme with Leaven Cooled? It is just that know someone who would use the exact same infoboxes and fits the descriptions I have read elsewhere, can't be that many people out there.--DO11.10 04:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow really, I thought I had you pegged! PhD at UA in Imm. then in the US and an academic, and you are a drinker (oh wait, also a Scot :)) Anyway, I am really a "mouse doctor" (hence my user name), and anything that you could add to the immunolgy pages that is outside the scope of humans (re: mammals) would be greatly appreciated. If you ever need anything, just let me know.--DO11.10 05:11, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the eicosanoid pix
Thanks for the eicosanoid pix. I'm hoping to get the article up to A level; the pictures help a lot. You asked Needs a little simplification for readers unfamiliar with the background, especially with the chemistry and the acronyms that have been used. Were you talking about the terms used in the article? Or in my comments about what needed to be done? David.Throop 15:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ciar,
 * your doing the references on Eicosanoid long-hand. Would you like a hand to do the inline references?
 * Well, I'm using templates; it's not completely long-hand.  I'm happy to have help, thanks!  I like the Harvard style of references.  It's not quite clear to me what 'inline' references mean.  Does it mean a cite within the text (like I've got now with the Harvard style?)  Or does it mean having all the info of the cite inline with a text, using &lt;ref&gt;?  As near as I can tell, if we use the &lt;ref&gt; approach with the cite-info inline, there's no way to have an alphabetical list of references.  The link you gave says that 'inline citations are considered mandatory', but it's not a policy doc.
 * I like the citation templates for several reasons, including that they enable the automated processing of citations by bots. The relevant policy WP:CITE notes that
 * Some editors find templates helpful, while other editors find them annoying, particularly when used inline in the text.
 * Put me in the camp that finds them annoying when used inline in the text.
 * Are you an artist? What I really need help with is Wikiproject_Metabolic_Pathways/requested_pictures
 * David.Throop 14:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Immune system FA
I love the immunological peace sign. :) So &mdash; are Scots just born cool, or is there a special course you all take at Aberdeen before you're unleashed on the world?  Hearty congratulations from me, too; please don't discount your own wonderful contributions, which I hope to see many more of, Willow 12:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein!
– ClockworkSoul 18:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Eicosanoid Peer Review

 * I've asked for Peer review for Eicosanoid. Since you've helped and shown an interest, I invite your input.David.Throop 23:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jurkats.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jurkats.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Basigin
Thanks for your help on Basigin. You made it into a bono-fide article just a few hours after I created the stub. --Selket Talk 16:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Congrats!
On the Antibody GA award. Great work!--DO11.10 15:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

vWF and acute phase
My edit comment meant that factor VIII, which is normally bound to von Willebrand factor, is an acute phase protein (which it is, of course). However, vWF itself is not - unless I've missed something. It is mentioned on the acute phase protein page, but when I checked with the Oxford Textbook of Medicine, Prof Pepys doesn't list it as such. Harrison's doesn't provide such a list. does seem to indicate that it rises in inflammation, so the matter is clearly not settled. JFW | T@lk  21:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Antibody peer review
Hi Ciar!! You've probably noticed, but I just put Antibody up for peer review. Seemed like a pretty good idea, and I thought that the input would be really nice, if you have any comments or suggestions.... I will post an FYI at the MCB and (probably at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine too since I put Poliomyelitis up for peer review as well).--DO11.10 03:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:COA-BC-Large.jpg
Hello, Ciar. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:COA-BC-Large.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Ciar. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Copenhagen coa.jpg
Hello, Ciar. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Copenhagen coa.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Ciar. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:IgBS.png
Thanks for uploading Image:IgBS.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 08:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Class switch recombination.png
What a beautiful and clear diagram! --Arcadian 01:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I concur—v.nice!! Also I have replied to your message on my talk page, dunno if you have it watchlisted.--DO11.10 18:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Antibody
I have ported the test version as you probably noticed, of course now we have the ole' wikilinked-but-not-at-the-fist-occurrence problem. It probably needs a good copy edit. --DO11.10 19:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, I haven't forgotten about you, I just thought I would let you have the article for a bit. It is looking better and better. If you will let me know when you are through... Also, Tim has offered his assistance, when he is through with the Evolution FAC, which is fantastic! Cheers--DO11.10 23:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Nice work on the Antibody article! Thanks.  ManVhv 06:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanxs!
Take a look at all your hard work: Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Virus articles by quality log...that must be like a thousand pages tagged! From the looks and timing of your edits, you're not using a bot...which is extremely impressive. Thanxs for exposing/infecting (pun intended) the Virus Wikiproject to all the virus pages. Keep up the good work! =D  Jumping cheese   Cont @ct 08:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanxs for the reply! It's nice to meet someone new too. Have fun editing! =)  Jumping cheese   Cont @ct 07:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Morpholino
Thanks for your work reviewing and suggesting improvements -- it was a great help!

JonMoulton 23:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Alpha-fetoprotein
I have nominated the AFP page for collaborative work. Would you care to vote?

Hi there
I notice I promised to help with antibody, must get back to that! If you have a free moment in the meantime, when you're not basking in the Aberdeenshire sun, would you be interested in reviewing Oxidative phosphorylation FAC? Any comments or suggestions at Featured article candidates/Oxidative phosphorylation‎ would be very welcome. All the best. Tim Vickers 01:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Virus project evaluation of HHV ICP0 article
Greetings! Thanks for your evaluation of the article HHV Infected Cell Polypeptide 0 (ICP0). You evaluated the article in April, and I have revised it considerable since. I wonder if you revisit the evaluation? ManVhv 21:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Allergy
Hi Ciar,

Long time no see! I hope you are doing well. So, JFW asked me to take a look at allergy. I have had a pass through, made some edits, but it is not good. This was my favorite passage, urgh! Anyway, could you take a pass through when you get a chance? I am overwhelmed. Thanks!--DO11.10 (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Brilliant job! Thanks for your input. I wish I'd got you involved sooner. JFW | T@lk  10:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * You are doing an excellent job! I feel like I am leaving you hanging, though. I promise to get in there in the next few days. Anything specific you would like me to focus on? I was planning on tackling the "epidemiology" bits so that the POV banner can be removed, but if you had anything in mind...?--DO11.10 01:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Evolution talk page
I don't mean to be offensive as I was talking more about a political regime influenced by religious fundamentalism. It is a fact that the Iranian government is repressing and suppressing scientist in Iran as published in Science magazine. Perhaps I should just add the reference. I am not attacking a people or religion and if you are Iranian and I offended you then I apologize for any unintended insults. Regards, GetAgrippa 19:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for qualifying, and you are probably correct that I was being insensitive. It did strike me odd and I apologize if I sounded harsh. I am known to stick my foot in my mouth on occassion so I appreciate your concerns. Thanks again. GetAgrippa 20:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Upon further thought. You convicted me so I recanted. I tend to be a jovial sort and I wouldn't intentionally insult anyone. Regards GetAgrippa 20:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Snake articles
Hi Ciar! I've noticed you've been busy to a certain degree with the snake articles, but I also see that you know something about biochemistry and so forth. So, I was thinking: perhaps you'd be interested in making some more serious contributions to the venomous snake articles, particularly to the venom sections. You may not be a toxinologist, but I'm sure you understand more about the subject than I do. I was thinking of more venom information like that in Echis, Echis carinatus and Daboia, but I struggle with the source material, because to me it usually looks to be written by specialists for specialists (or just poorly written). If you think this would be outside your field (or just don't have the time), then I'd understand, but if you'd like to give it a try, I'd be happy to help out where I can. (PS -- Please answer here, as I've temporarily added your talk page to my watchlist). --Jwinius (talk) 02:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey there Jwinius. This isn't really my speciality, but I will have a go at converting some of those medical terms into plain English....when I get a free moment that is! Thanks,  ~ Ciar ~  (Talk to me!)  05:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * IMO, the language that's there now isn't all that bad, especially when the terms are linked to articles that make a good job of explaining the concepts. What I'd really like to see it new stuff. But, if you think that's a bit too challenging, then I understand. --Jwinius (talk) 13:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

your suggestion
I liked your suggestion for a hatnote on the Mithell Report, and I created it. all the best, -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 23:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)