User talk:Ciaran H/Middle man

Requested move to Middle man
to move the page to Middle man

This move was decided in the talk page, but there are problems because Middle man already exists. The histories of Middle man (computer program) and Middle man (AIM plugin) also need to be merged, hence the second move. Ciaran H 22:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Voting

 * Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~ 


 * Support though will this require an admin? --Lox (t,c) 16:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Add any additional comments
 * Comment It seems the general consensus (including support on this page) is for this page move to go ahead. I believe this requires admin assistance; if it doesn't, I'm going ahead now, if it does, I'll request an admin. --Lox (t,c) 13:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, it requires admin assistance, which is why I made a request. I believe this is the proper method of doing moves when they need admin assistance; I'm not sure if there are any quicker ways if there's already a consensus. --Ciaran H 19:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No, unfortunately there isn't and to make matters worse, there is a massive backlog at Requested Moves (which I'm attempting to help clear). I've requested help at the administrator noticeboard; my comment above was just to make is clear there was a consensus on the move for any admin that wanders across this page. Good work by the way! --Lox (t,c) 20:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. --Lox (t,c) 10:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Second move
Thanks for that. However, there was another move I had requested which I unfortunately didn't make clear on this page; Middle man (computer program) (and talk page) to Middle man (AIM plugin). This is so that the histories can be combined and so that there aren't two copies of the page. Thanks! --Ciaran H 22:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I've just requested another move over at Talk:Middle man (computer program), if that's useful, please support the vote. Hopefully an admin will speed it through. P.S. Hope you don't mind me archiving the discussion! --Lox (t,c) 11:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)