User talk:Cigarette

WikiProject Theatre
Hi! This is a note to let you know that I have just established WikiProject Theatre. Please come and join us in building up Wiipedia’s articles relating to theatre! Ganymead 17:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Relic -> The Relic
Cigarette, I see you moved the article at Relic to The Relic. I'm sure your intentions were good, however what you did has caused a bit of a problem. First off, it looks like you moved the page simply by copying the text of the article and slapping it in the new article, The Relic. While this is technically the correct title of the novel, the move, as you did it, is now missing all of its edit history, which is significant. The correct way to move an article is to use the "Move this page" link. Using that facility moves an article preserving its edit history.

Second, you moved the article, but didn't change any text to reflect the new location of the article (i.e. you didn't change Relic to The Relic). While you aren't required to do this, due diligence usually includes making such edits. In addition, by not making such edits, you broke the link to the movie's article.

Now since you created The Relic, I can't move Relic the correct way with the "Move this page" facility (regular users can only move articles to new names, not existing ones). I now have to ask an administrator to move the page for me. If I remember, I'll then go and do the "due diligence" edits to the article (sometimes the administrators who move the articles do it, though). So please don't make anymore edits to The Relic until I can get an administrator to move the article correctly.

Like I said, I think your intentions were good, but next time you move an article, please do it with the "Move this page" facility. &mdash; Frecklefoot | Talk 19:46, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ⸏
A tag has been placed on ⸏, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ARended Winter 15:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fuck film poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fuck film poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

A Texas Trilogy
I noticed you changed the plays from one act to full length. How do you know they are full length? The plays were presented together in one evening. It would be unusual to have three whole plays performed together on one night.Nrswanson (talk) 04:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2007 Rock Hall Inductees
Template:2007 Rock Hall Inductees has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. G(x) (talk) 05:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Larry Larson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larry Larson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Larry Larson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sarrail (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)