User talk:Cignorm

Speedy deletion nomination of Cignorm Open Source Organisation


A tag has been placed on Cignorm Open Source Organisation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the page that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 14:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article both for being entirely promotional  and for giving no indication of importance..

you said on the now deleted talk p.:

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (we have Created this page and We Don't think that this page is Against Wikipedia's Policy. As Its already maintained in the page that the Organisation is being founded in 2008 we haven't said anything about the total revenue and other unknown topics. The firm is a Non profitable Organisation and Its just started Up so How can we expect a proof such as national news/media telecast we Don't have any key of references other then Our website. Its actually a Startup firm which basically providing Opensource and free web applications to educational institutions. Any thing written in the page is not fake and being copied ) --Cignorm (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Just as you say, you are a start up and need to spread the word about yourself. That's exactly what we mean by promotional.

This is an encyclopedia, and we just don't do that: what would you look for in an encyclopedia , information about the companies that are already important or information about the firms which are not yet?, As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. And keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive. But don't even try it until you have become important enough to have references about you providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. However, since the name you have used includes or refers to the subject of the article, you must choose another username. As explained in WP:USER, only individuals may edit. When you have a username that is or includes the name of your organization, you imply that you are editing officially, and have a superior right to edit the page. But that is not the way WP works--all editors are considered equal--and your contributions like those of any editor must be justified by sources. I'm sure you do not intend to give such impression, but that's why we have the rule. Therefore, please choose another name. On that user   page, you should say whom you are working for.  DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cignorm Open Source Organisation


A tag has been placed on Cignorm Open Source Organisation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. West Eddy (talk) 18:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Cignorm Open Source Organisation, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —teb728 t c 21:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)