User talk:Cimas

Welcome!
I noticed that in the Business War Games, you put in text citations, but it didn't show up. At the end of each article, put a tag that says. I have already fixed it, but in the future, that is how you do that. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me.  ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line§ 17:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * First of all, when you leave a notice on someone's talk page, leave a title on it like I did above. You do that by typing ==Welcome!== . Secondly, I'll take a look at your references and fix them for you. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line§ 13:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what you did now. You have to put the full title in the in-text citations. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line§ 13:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * First of all, your tone is not helping solve any problem. Secondly, if you truly want to help out here in Wikipedia, like you so avidly claim, it helps if you create the pages in the correct format. Finally, I am going to post links for you to read before you continue editing. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line§ 16:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

So, let me get this right-this was all original research? And the citations were only further reading? I'm truly sorry, but I am going to have to put all of your articles up for deletion. Finally, please refrain from putting comments in that tone on my talk page. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 20:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

I NEVER stated anywhere that form goes over content. All of your articles are solely original research, and when I put the references, I thought those were the names of the books. Thank you, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line§ 20:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? There is no research which is not original in the sense that when someone writes a value for Wiki, it has to be original, or it should be subsumed under another value. All the references were related to the text. Instead of taking responsibility for your sabotage of value, you like to use threats, don't you? Now grow up, kid,m this encyclopedia is not your play ground, it is used by real people to gain knowledge. If you can't understand that wait untiol you mature a little, and come back to this community. It is not aboput your technical prowess but about knowledge. If you want to refer this discussion to higher authority (administrator or Jimmy Wales) buy all means, let see who is right about your disragrd for basic etiquette and your careless work on the Business War Games site. If you are an administrator, let's see if we can take this privilege away from you. You are a menace to this adult encycolpedia.

If you don't want me to start raising this issues about responsilbility of what you did on your Talk page, get out of Wiki.

I am going to kindly ask you to leave me alone before I do get a higher authority figure to block you. I am also kindly asking you to stop personally attacking me. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 20:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Please-Cool off a little. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 21:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Header
By the way, you don't put welcome on everything. I just used that as an example. The header has to pertain to the subject of your post. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 16:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Friendly warning
Hi there Cimas. It looks like you have a lot to contribute to Wikipedia, and for that thank you. Besides being an encyclopedia first and foremost, this is also a community of volunteers, including me, including you, and including Redmarkviolinist. The attacks that you've made against one of the other volunteers are unacceptable. Calling another user "son", among other offensive comments, does nothing but ironically show your own immaturity and bias. I ask, please, in a friendly way, for you to relax with the accusations and attacks against another volunteer. At this point, I feel you owe Redmarkviolinist an apology, but it is within your prerogative to do so or not. Again, thank you for your additions to this website. You are welcome to edit here. You are not welcome to attack other editors. If you have any questions about this message, about how to communicate and collaborate with other editors, or to show me evidence of any sort that you are being wrongly accused, please visit my talkpage by clicking the "76" in my signature. Cheers, Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Cimas, I received your message on my talkpage, and thank you for your response. I haven't looked too far into the dispute between you and another volunteer, I simply looked at the direction your messages towards another volunteer seemed to be heading, and didn't want to see you (or anyone else) go down that road.  That to say, I do respect your age, and your tenure, and your status of professor.  It is quite obvious to me that Redmarkviolin is quite a bit younger and therefore less experienced than you. And that, as I'm sure you will certainly agree, does not give you license to talk in a condenscending and incivil manner towards another editor, regardless of age.  Some of our finest admins and bureaucrats even, are several decades younger than you and I. I'd like to see you become a mentor of sorts, if you will, to younger editors, that by and large mean well in their enthusiasm, and generally have more computer/technology based knowledge than us "old folks", and could certainly help us out.  (and yes, I'm closer to your side of the age spectrum than I lead on on my talkpage or userpage)....For now, I'll watch the debate happening between two otherwise fine editors. Use the talkpages to sort differences, don't create war within the articles, which are meant for the readers not the writers.  Let me know on my talk page if you need assistance of any kind.  Have you made any attempt to apologize to Mr. Violin, or shall I copy/paste your message from my talkpage to his?   Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Blindspots analysis, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 23:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)