User talk:Cincinattus

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
You have received these suggestions because we are currently running a study to see if SuggestBot is helpful for newly registered Wikipedia editors. Normally SuggestBot only makes suggestions for users who ask for them explicitly on the SuggestBot request page. We will not post suggestions on your talk page again unless you ask for them. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find a complete consent form with contact information on the SuggestBot Study page.

SuggestBot picks the articles you might be interested in based on the articles you've edited and using a number of different techniques: following links from them to other articles, matching articles based on their content, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedia users. It tries to recommend only articles that others have marked as needing work, such as stub articles that need to be made longer, clean-up articles that need writing help, and so on. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you choose to participate we encourage you to leave feedback on these suggestions, which you can most easily do here by editing your user talk page. We'll stop by later to read them.

Regards,, project researcher and SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Reason for Revert
An editor writes there is no evidence for my Human Rights abuses comments. Evidence is now added by a member of the NCKU Teacher's Union. But the fact that I won the case is evidence in itself. Editor claims foreign teachers were not protected by the Teachers Law of the ROC. This is contradicted by both court and Ministry of Education (Taipei) rulings. Even if Editor were correct this in itself would prove human rights violations (i.e. discrimination of foreign teachers). So the Editor seems to be admitting what he is denying! These facts can be verified through the ROC Ministry of Education. In addition, this case is fully documented on my blog at http://rdca45.blogspot.com/ --Cincinattus (talk) 18:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm not clear what you mean by your Edit revert summary on the NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY page that the deleted material was "unsourced." The material is fully sourced here http://rdca45.blogspot.com/ If source material is required on the Wikipedia page I'll be happy to oblige. You may also wish to check the Chinese version of that page, if it hasn't been altered yet. I'm not sure what kind of "sourcing" you wish, but whatever you ask for I will give. There are court documents, letters from the Ministry of Education,summaries of the case from the National Cheng Kung University Teachers Union, etc. What other sources are required? The Ministry of Education in Taipei canceled an illegal dismissal on 8 January 2001. It rejected the university's claim that foreign faculty are not protected by the Teachers Law. But even if that were the case it would, ironically, still prove discrimination at NCKU by any reasonable or international standards.--Cincinattus (talk) 10:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Your own personal blog does not count as a reliable source, sources need to be from reliable third parties, see Identifying reliable sources-- Jac 16888 Talk 14:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

My Edit on Human Rights Abuses at National Cheng Kung University has been removed several times on the basis of being unsourced. In one edit summary you say that a personal blog is not a source; but there are many public sources (in Chinese) on that blog (http://rdca45.blogspot.com/), regardless whether it's a personal blog or not. Here's a link (http://rdca45.blogspot.com/search/label/Letters%20from%20the%20Ministry%20of%20Education) to one source, letters from the Ministry of Education written over a period of nearly two and a half years urging the university to issue retroactive contracts following a favorable appeal ruling on 8 January 2001. These letters are in both the original Chinese and rough English translations. Surely letters written by an official state agency should be adequate sources, as I understand the word. Please tell me if that source is adequate. If not, what more I can do to confirm my sources and will you accept a Chinese-language source. Thank you.--Cincinattus (talk) 15:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Content hosted on your blog is not reliable either, particularly since you are clearly not a neutral person when it comes to this, and the letters you say are from the ministry, there is no proof that this is the case. By reliable sources we're talking from reputable sources such as news companies etc-- Jac 16888 Talk 15:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:MoeLetters.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:MoeLetters.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Plagiarism Issue.pdf
Thank you for uploading File:Plagiarism Issue.pdf. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:45, 7 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 09:45, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Student Issue.pdf
Thank you for uploading File:Student Issue.pdf. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 09:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Curriculum Claims.pdf
Thank you for uploading File:Curriculum Claims.pdf. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 09:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Further discussion
Since you continue to restore the content I have raised the issue here. I strongly advise you to attempt to address the points i have made-- Jac 16888 Talk 18:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Tainan Court Verdict.pdf listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tainan Court Verdict.pdf, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  02:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Taipei Ministry Document3.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Taipei Ministry Document3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Taipei Ministry Document1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Taipei Ministry Document1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Taipei Ministry Document.pdf


A tag has been placed on File:Taipei Ministry Document.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reticulated Spline (t &bull; c) 11:37, 28 November 2014 (UTC)