User talk:Cindamuse/Archive 24

Mail
Pine(talk) 06:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Doodle for April Wikipedia Education Program meeting
Please leave your availability for the April Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting on this Doodle so we can find the best time for all of us.

I also need a volunteer to lead the meeting! Will you help? Leave a message. It requires no advanced preparation, just the ability to welcome everyone and move us through the agenda. -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk)

 If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription &middot; Distributed via Global message delivery, 20:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Biography subject
I'd like to ask your help in creating a biography article on reporter Bob Wyrick. I've got some COI in the subject so I don't want to touch it, but I'm sure the fellow's notable. I did a little looking and wrote some very rough notes but haven't dug very far. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look to see if you think there's a stub or an article in it. Either way I'll leave it alone except for this request. Cloveapple (talk) 08:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * As an award-winning author and journalist, I think there's certainly enough information to support developing an article about him. Just make sure not to focus on articles simply because he wrote them. A journalist doesn't inherit notability by reporting about notable individuals or events. Focus on the honors and awards received for the specific work for which he has done. Bring information and content to the article that supports Wyrick individually as a notable person. Sometimes, it gets a bit tricky writing articles about journalists, because there is often quite a bit of information to be found with his name attached. That said, the journalist is generally not the notable subject. Just work on the draft in a subpage of your userspace. Then when it is ready and fully supported through significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of Wyrick and his associates and employers, ask for a review before moving it to the mainspace. Feel free to contact me at any time if you need help with anything. I'm happy to jump in and do whatever you need. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 21:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the excellent advice. I've created or worked on other articles but I'm not comfortable working on this one because of the COI issues that are involved for me. I don't think I can give the article the neutrality it requires. I asked you because I've seen you working on various biographies and thought you might have an interest in at least a stub. Cloveapple (talk) 21:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Two
Hi! Welcome to the second edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse! You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. -- Sarah (talk) 21:36, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Teahouse celebrates one month of being open! This first month has drawn a lot of community interest to the Teahouse. Hosts & community members have been working with the project team to improve the project in many ways including creating scripts to make inviting easier, exploring mediation processes for troubling guests, and best practices regarding mentoring for new editors who visit the Teahouse.
 * First month metrics report an average of 30 new editors visiting the Teahouse each week. Approximately 30 new editors participate in the Teahouse each week, by way of asking questions and making guest profiles. An average of six new questions and four new profiles are made each day. We'd love to hear your ideas about how we can spread the word about the Teahouse to more new editors.
 * Teahouse has many regulars. Like any great teahouse, our Teahouse has a 61% return rate of guests, who come back to ask additional questions and to also help answer others' questions. Return guests cite the speedy response rate of hosts and the friendly, easy to understand responses by the hosts and other participants as the main reasons for coming back for another cup o' tea!
 * Early metrics on retention. It's still too early to draw conclusions about the Teahouse's impact on new editor retention, but, early data shows that 38% of new editors who participate at the Teahouse are still actively editing Wikipedia 2-4 weeks later, this is compared with 7% from a control group of uninvited new editors who showed similar first day editing activity. Additional metrics can be found on the Teahouse metrics page.
 * Nine new hosts welcomed to the Teahouse. Nine new hosts have been welcomed to the Teahouse during month one: Chicocvenancio, Cullen328, Hallows AG, Jeffwang, Mono, Tony1, Worm That Turned, Writ Keeper, and Nathan2055. Welcome to the Teahouse gang, folks!
 * Say hello to the new guests at the Teahouse. Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest guests at the Teahouse. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, as being welcomed by experienced editors is a really nice way to make new editors feel welcome.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:53, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:15, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know: Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
 * Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
 * If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:More footnotes
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:More footnotes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:15, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Join us Monday for April Wikipedia Education Program meeting
Greetings, I need your help to lead the next Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting! Will you leave a message if you can help? It requires no advanced preparation, just the ability to welcome everyone and move us through the agenda.

The next meeting has been scheduled for Monday, April 23 at 20:00 UTC. See the meeting information page for joining instructions and a time converter. Hope to talk with you on Monday! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk)

 If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription &middot; Distributed via Global message delivery, 19:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Stories Project
Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I asked Sarah Stierch who might be good to talk to, and she gave me your name.

I'd very much like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project.

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 19:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Template messages
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Template messages. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Chinese Christian Church (Milson's Point)
Just for reference, I converted your speedy deletion tagging of Chinese Christian Church (Milson's Point) with a Prod, because I felt that there was a credible claim of importance (being the largest Chinese Christian culture in Australia), but also agree that without sources and more info, it doesn't meet WP:GNG, so prod is appropriate. I'll take it to AfD if the prod is removed and no sources are provided. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:42, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Get Smart!
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Get Smart!. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:54, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Pipeworks
I've commented on the Speedy Deletion page. The article itself is now in the process of being fleshed out and follows the format of other microbrewery articles on Wikipedia. Like I said on the SD page, the article isn't 24 hours old yet, and I hadn't much of a chance to get anything done last night before going to work. It is, in fact, a notable article if you are a member of Wikiproject Beer, or Wikiproject Chicago. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

FYI, I didn't remove the template. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 13:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:User pages
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:User pages. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 04:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chernobyl after the disaster
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chernobyl after the disaster. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Indentation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Indentation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

CE and Minor editing
Hi Cindy, your edit summary here said "Copyedit (minor)". However, this isn't a copyedit and it isn't minor. A minor copyedit would involve something like fixing capitalization or spelling. You made a content change to the page. Content changes shouldn't be marked as minor edits and they're not copyedits. Please see here for the policy on marking edits as minor. Maybe you were tired and just made a mistake, but please be careful. Thank you. Pine(talk) 09:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey there! Thanks for contacting me. You are correct. The edit summary and mark as a minor edit were made through the automatic (default) edit summary software, clearly made in error. Tricky little devil sometimes. I intended to go back and make a dummy edit summary to clarify, but then I got sidetracked. The information about the previous incarnation of the Steering Committee and their future involvement in the Education Program did not support the content in the paragraph, appearing rather as an arbitrary afterthought. I went to edit the grammar, but chose to simply remove the content as inapplicable to the current status of the program. Hope you are well. Again, thanks for contacting me. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 09:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:18, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:10th Earl of Shaftesbury and Jamila M'Barek prior to his death.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:10th Earl of Shaftesbury and Jamila M'Barek prior to his death.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:31, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:15, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse
Hi Cindamuse! I really appreciate your contributions at the Teahouse and I know you haven't been able to contribute as much as you'd like. I hope you don't mind, but, for now I am going to remove you from the your hosts page and move you to our past hosts page which will be linked from the hosts page. You are of course encouraged to move yourself back to the active host page anytime, or just drop by to lend a hand at your convenience. I'm really glad you were able to participate in the pilot! Enjoy the spring and see you for a cup of tea soon! p.s. thanks for helping out with gender gap :) Sarah (talk) 17:25, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Lawsuit Dismissed/Content Edit Question
MamaElmo (talk) 18:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
<tt style="border:1px solid #eee;padding:0 5px;background:#fff;"><b style="color:#911;background:#fff;"><i style="color:#000;">./</i>zro</b></tt> (⠠⠵) 08:17, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

IRC Help
Hello, I get an error message whemever I try to get on IRC saying "404 - File or directory not found. The resource you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable." &#42;-Ax10m77-* (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Citing sources
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Citing sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Suzanne Deuchler
Just wondering why you threw the BLP sources tag on this article. It's a stub, but there is a high quality citation from the Chicago Tribune discussion her political position. Cheers Dkriegls (talk) 04:16, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * While the Trib is reliable, all articles require significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. One reference is not considered significant. The BLP sources tag was placed in lieu of BLP unsourced, due to the Trib citation. Can you add more to the article? Keep in mind that the Political Graveyard is wholly unreliable. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 05:26, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I see you went ahead and took the initiative :) I'm still interested in the reasoning for your BLP action though; just trying to learn. Doesn't Notability (people) trump significant coverage? A reliable source stating that they "held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office" should suffice for notability. That's my understanding anyways. Just wondering if you had a different way of viewing things. Dkriegls (talk) 00:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Most times, I place a tag as a personal reminder to go back later to fix the issues myself. I couldn't find much about her parents though, which was a bit frustrating! ;) There's often confusion over the notability criteria. Meeting one of the criteria under Notability (people) does not solidify or confirm notability, or trump the requirement for significant coverage. It is simply an indicator that the subject may be notable. Likely or presumed to be notable, but confirmed through significant reliable and independent sources. The guidelines say, "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included." It still comes back to the requirement that claims of notability must be supported through significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Hope that helps. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 00:30, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hm, If you're using that as a personal reminder, that makes sense. Cheers and happy editing. Dkriegls (talk) 03:46, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

RE: Userspace deletion requests
I want to delete my entire account User:stywuschik, if possible. If not, only pages. I´ve created an universal account Seti6908 and would like to have only one. Best regards--Seti6908 (talk) 16:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay. Thanks. Best regards--Seti6908 (talk) 17:30, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr.Jitendra Nath Gohain


A tag has been placed on Dr.Jitendra Nath Gohain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 17:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The editor who posted above has a problem with speedy tagging: you might want to have a read of his talk page, and add some advice of your own. Thanks, Scopecreep (talk) 17:52, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I have done so. Thanks. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 18:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jitendra Nath Gohain. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 17:56, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I did not create the Jitendra Nath Gohain, but declined your A7, due to clear indication of importance and/or significance. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 17:59, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You did create this article — see page history A:-)Brunuś (talk) 18:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Uh, no, there was an edit conflict in the system when another editor deleted the article for promotional content. I am not the originator of the article. As stated on your talkpage, please review the criteria for speedy deletion before nominating anymore articles for deletion. Thanks. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 18:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 18:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Company names
I don't see that convention being applied in Microsoft, Dell, Intel or many other company articles for that matter. Neither is it prescribed for in the infobox documentation, else why would there be a name parameter at all? Regards, -- Tærkast (Discuss) 10:07, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Checking out the documentation, I can see that apparently not all infoboxes are created equal. The general rationale has been to forego adding the infobox header, when the image provides a wordmark, in an effort to reduce redundancy and unclutter the article. This guidance has been a primary part of reviewing articles, and long been the case when name fields are not required, as is the case with the infobox parameters for companies. That said, it is clearly not included in the infobox documentation as you have shown. I certainly wouldn't be opposed if you were to replace the infobox header accordingly. Thanks for bringing the discrepancy to my attention. It may be that there was an RFC that somehow crept past my prying eyes. Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 14:32, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Nah, it's no problem :). -- Tærkast (Discuss) 18:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Nor Izzati Binti Ismail (2011/2012) CSD decline
HI, you declined this db-bio nom, saying that the entry asserts notability as a university president, but that's not what the entry claims (he heads a group connected to a University). Maybe you want to revisit this? If you still think it passes speedy, that's fine; I didn't want to retag it without consulting you. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 18:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Dang, clearly I read that wrong. I honestly thought it was a weird name for a university, but thought to give the benefit of the doubt to see what sources would turn up. At this point, I certainly don't think it passes a speedy, but since the A7 was declined, however absolutely boneheaded it was on my part, I would probably opt to wait out the BLPPROD and see what comes of it. Either way, it will most certainly be deleted. Adding another A7 would probably raise red flags of another kind, but at this point, I fully support deletion. What are your thoughts? Best regards,  Cindy  ( talk to me ) 18:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I really don't expect this to go anywhere, deletion is probably inevitable. If you want to just let the PROD run out, that's fine with me. Hairhorn (talk) 00:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey


Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!

We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)