User talk:Cindy141

Recent additions
Hi,

The definitions you've been adding to various articles recently (e.g. aliasing) are unnecessary, as the article already defines the subject, and possibly copyright violation. Please stop! Oli Filth 15:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I forgot to reply earlier. Please see my response at User talk:Oli Filth.  Oli Filth 10:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Active picture
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Active picture, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Active picture is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Active picture, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Conflict of interest and copyright violation
According to this diff, you work for the company whose information you are putting into many articles. That's WP:COI as well as clear copyright violation since the company has not granted a suitable license to the material. And adding links to your companies is known as WP:SPAM. I reverted all your contributions. Please stop. Dicklyon 16:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hello. I am sorry to add my voice to the chorus here but working for this company puts you in a conflict of interest and makes it difficult for you to maintain the necessary objectivity and neutrality. Moreover, the fact that you work for this company does not give you the right to reuse material copyrighted by the company unless the company's website explicitly releases that material under a license compatible with Wikipedia's GFDL. Thank you, Pascal.Tesson 17:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your question
Hello. I just got your question. The usual way of checking permissions regarding copyright questions is through the Open-source Ticket Request System which will put you in contact with the Wikimedia Foundation. Regarding the delicate questions of conflicts of interest, I recommend you get in touch with who has quite a bit of experience in these matters. I'm sure she'll be a better guide through this than I can be (of course, feel free to come back to me if she doesn't have the time to handle this). Thank you for your patience through all this. You'll find that the Wikipedia wheels can turn a little slow but they do turn! Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 16:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)