User talk:CindyC78

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction
Wow! I sure do wish other articles would spring forth as well-formed as yours just did. You spent months on your subpage and you have created a genuine winner. Marvelous, marvelous job!!! Regards, PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Glad to do it. You deserve all the praise you can get for your effort.  PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Please see the discussion which I have started at Talk:Sacroiliac joint dysfunction. We will need to take a bit of time to explore some issues that have been raised regarding the article. Thanks. Johnuniq (talk) 12:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry that your hard work has been criticized, but that is the nature of Wikipedia, I'm afraid. I have no views on the matter, and am merely attempting to offer advice on procedure. I hope you don't mind, but at Wikipedia we do not duplicate messages. If needed, it is fine to add a link on one page, where the link points to a discussion on another page, but the same message should not be posted in both places as that leads to confusion (are the two messages the same? where should replies occur?). In this case, the discussion should be about the content of Sacroiliac joint dysfunction, so the discussion should take place at Talk:Sacroiliac joint dysfunction. There is no need to comment at another editor's talk page at this stage because those concerned have already been notified that discussion should proceed at the article talk page. I am hoping that an editor experienced in the field (as I mentioned on the article talk page re the WikiProject) will comment. Johnuniq (talk) 11:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

June 2014
I'm sorry, but your edit to Cloward–Piven strategy has been removed twice now. The source used is not reliable and the quotation is far too long for our purposes. Please discuss further edits at Talk:Cloward–Piven strategy. Continuing to add material without discussion can result in blocks and we'd all like to avoid that. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 04:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)