User talk:Cindy larkin

See this, this, this, this, this, this, Template:Prime Ministers of Burma (Myanmar) and this. Not only does Wikipedia's Community say that we disagree with you, but the main source for heads of state and government disagree with you. Therequiembellishere 19:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Uh, all but one link are to Wikipedia, which is not a reliable source, nor does it say the "community" disagrees with me, since you and Nightstallion seem to have edited this into most of those articles.
 * As for rulers.org, it exactly agrees with me. You must be having reading comprehension problems. It says "Apr", not "18 May", and indicates he is still acting. Perhaps two levels of brackets are too much for you, or you would realize that "to 12 Oct 2007" only refers to "for Soe Win". Obviously he can't still act for Soe Win after Soe Win is dead; now he is acting during a vacancy in the substantive office. Cindy larkin 20:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Then the date of acting amounts to April, your main point hasn't been proven, it clearly states, "acting [for Soe Win to 12 Oct 2007]" clearly meaning that he is now the Prime Minister. Therequiembellishere 02:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I suppose "A" also clearly means "B" in your world. By your interpretation, the square brackets wouldn't make any sense. Clearly the matter is as I just explained above. Cindy larkin 11:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Clearly you don't realise that you are the only one with a problem regarding his premiership. If everyone on the Burma page has no problems, the page that details the most of the country, you are going against the Community. Therequiembellishere 17:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The mere fact that no one watching the Burma page has noticed this error hardly proves anything. In fact, Thein Sein was listed there as PM even before October 12, due to the premature report of Soe Win's death. That's why Wikipedia is not a reliable source. If you think he's PM, simply show me a report of his appointment. You will have plenty of egg on your face when such a report will come in later. Cindy larkin 19:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I actually won't really care, I'll just make sure that the date gets changed. Therequiembellishere 20:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * So until then, you are just happily making stuff up. Well, not much I can do but to revert you as a vandal then. Cindy larkin 21:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The same can be said for you, except you have no one supporting you and as little evidence as I do. Therequiembellishere 21:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * There is all the evidence in the world that he was appointed acting prime minister, and no evidence that this has changed, so it is the default assumption that he still is. At worst, in the extremely unlikely case that he was appointed PM and it went totally unreported, the information would only be outdated. Your version, however, is in all likelihood flat wrong. And evidence counts, not who's supporting you on the wiki (which in your case is only Nightstallion anyway). Cindy larkin 22:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Iff you look, you'll seI did not add it to the two most looked at pages for information such as this, the List of current heads of state and government and the main Burma page, we aren't alone, so if you'd liek to bring it up, bring it up on one of those two pages and you can get more than me and NightStallion (who is an administrator, by the way) and me. The two of us seem to have not pushed our own point through and you have consistently been acting as if you are the most experienced editor of the three of us. Therequiembellishere 22:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I can bring it up wherever I want, and Thein Sein would seem to be the most topical article about Thein Sein. You're pushing your point through right now, and you would behave the same on any of the other pages. I don't care to be involved in ten edit wars at a time, so I won't fix the other articles before the matter is settled on this one. Don't expect me to be impressed by your edit count (or Nightstallion's adminship for that matter). You are no authority, and you don't have any sources for your claim - that's all that matters here. Cindy larkin 16:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * sigh* I've stopped caring about your talk page. Therequiembellishere 23:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)