User talk:CineWorld

Chill.
You need to chill. Did I harass you? Other than the reverts on the IP page (which I assume is you), I have done -NOTHING-. You need to calm down a bit-- a lot of people will hear you out easier. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 03:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * IMDB cast page is my response. For now. (And yes, it proves your point.) - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 03:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, yes, I read all that. PLEASE let things happen. Right now there needs to be a discussion going on, and you're spamming my talk page. :P - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 03:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I appreciate where you're coming from, but attacking people won't get you anywhere, friend. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 03:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

How can someone follow you when you're coming back to the same page? - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 04:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way: You have a point in the sense that your edits could've been verified. That does NOT mean you shouldn't forgive other people. They might have not assume good faith, but does that mean you have to complain about them on every single page possible? - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 04:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, sometimes bad faith editors will change their IP address rapidly to undermine Wikipedia. That is why that they will follow your IP and give warnings if they think you're doing something wrong. It is NOTHING PERSONAL. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 04:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion: Do NOT touch someone else's user page unless you have 100% confidence that you can prove what you're doing. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 04:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Whoa
I'm not sure where the outburst is coming from, but I've never even touched the role. Not to add it, and not to remove it. I'm trying to mediate. Leebo T / C  03:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Part of the problem is that you're the only one with the hostile tone here. Please cease the veiled insults. It's really not that big of a deal, and I do not support the role being in the article. What I have supported is the fact that it's not right to edit other users' pages or to repeatedly revert. Leebo T / C  03:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It really doesn't matter who Shelbyyoung the user is, you can't edit that account's page without proof that it's a sockpuppet. Something tells me you wouldn't get a checkuser approved for ISpy/Shelbyyoung though. Leebo T / C  04:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If you leave another uncivil comment on my talk page, you will not be welcome to post on it again. You left 12 angry messages over a period of 90 minutes. Please stop using that tone. Leebo T / C  10:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Shelby Young
Ακουσε ρε παιδι! Σταματα!

I assume that you're the person who has been obsessing about this issue from IP addresses; the first edit you make to an article (after lots of aggressive edits to User Talk Pages) is the unjustified removal of text from Shelby Young, which has been discussed ad nauseam. If you continue to edit as disruptively as you did an an anonymous editor, you will be blocked from editing. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 17:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

RFC/USER discussion concerning you (CineWorld)
Hello, CineWorld. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Requests for comment/CineWorld 1, where you may want to participate. -- Real96 07:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)