User talk:CinebuffReviews

October 2019
Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of highest-grossing Nepali films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, feel free to respond below. Diff:  Though you might personally have lots of knowledge about Nepali films, we can't rely on your knowledge, because we cannot independently verify what you know. See our policy on original research. We also don't care what random blogs or random websites have to say. We are only interested in what mainstream publications with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy think. See our guidelines on reliable sources. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of highest-grossing Nepali films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Diffs: The bulk of these changes are unsourced and of the ones that are sourced, they are attributed to a blog, which is problematic, as I've detailed above. And even if we somehow assumed the blog is reliable (not likely), your changes aren't even all consistent. You have Chakka Panja 3 at 18.50 crore, when the blog you chose indicates 13.50. You put Baahubali 2 at 24 crore when the source you would have us believe says 23. This isn't sufficient from an accuracy standpoint, and I also don't think it's sufficient from a reliable sourcing standpoint. Again, see WP:UGC. If you submit more problematic content like this, it will be considered disruptive, so I hope you please double-check your work and only submit well-known, established mainstream sources like news websites, web magazines, etc.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:31, 25 October 2019 (UTC)