User talk:Cinemaseats

It is shocking you have deleted the page. This in the UK is classed as discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 where 'HIV' is specifically protected. I will be sharing this experience with my social media following.

Shocking.

Hi, I have edited the article and I believe the deletion was raised because I had linked the 'notable' publications of the subject of the article. My book has been published by me independently and has in turn been stocked by global retailers such as Waterstones (UK's biggest and most reputable bookseller) and the like in the USA, Barnes and Noble bookseller along with others in Australia such as Dymocks and TheNile. There is no denying that the subject of this article (book - non fiction) is of public interest in its content of lived and factual experience of one individual with HIV facing HIV stigma. Waterstones bookseller has catagroised this publication as: Political and educational>society and culture>social groups> gay and lesbian studies. Catagories that I truly believe to be worthy of a wiki page given the demographic this book is set to reach along with the article of 'social studies' and one individual may seek to read once it is expanded on for 'social and political studies'.

Any deletion or refusal to publish I feel will be a great disservice to the LGBT community and the rights held in the UK over equality where HIV is listed as a protected characteristic.

I await your reply with a great deal of interest.

Thank you for the welcome it was warmly acknowledged. Sincerely — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinemaseats (talk • contribs) 20:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Cinemaseats, I just wanted to pop in quickly and hopefully explain why your page was deleted. It actually has nothing to do with the substance of the article - you could have been writing about ground worms - but rather because what you did write was copied directly from other locations, and what wasn't copied directly was incredibly promotional, so much so that it's easiest to simply delete it and start over fresh.
 * Now, you are totally welcome to let your social media know what happened, but you are also welcome to try again! We have no rules against recreation of articles that are being written in good faith, so if you want to restart the article - using your own words - you are more than welcome to do so.
 * As a minor note, making legal threats is a big no-no on Wikipedia, so do keep that in mind going forward. The deletion of an article on Wikipedia is in no way, shape, or form discrimination under the UK's acts. Primefac (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

They are my own words, I wrote them and by that I clarify, I am the author of the book and all wording is 100% mine. I really dont need to be lectured by someone who clearly has far too much time sat behind their keyboard and yes I will be reaching out to my social media platforms.

On that note I thank you for your time.

Welcome!
Hello, Cinemaseats, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:THE LOST BOYS of SOHO, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:THE LOST BOYS of SOHO


A tag has been placed on Draft:THE LOST BOYS of SOHO, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.amazon.co.uk/~/e/B09PNM1BWH. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

You have just made a criminal act, by discriminating me and my article on HIV of which is a protected charteristic under EU/UK law, its that simple. I made edits as suggested and wrote a dispute stating the reasons and acknowledge and you still deleted the work I had done on the article. I have shared that you claims that the article is not major publication, of which it is and is a publication with a ISBN. The content is not promotion but the basis to expand on the political and social studies of HIV and HIV stigma in todays society. However, you have not responded and have deleted the article draft.

I do not make "threats" as you allege and/or allude, I have succeeded in two legal claims in the UK for HIV discrimination and have recognised your ations to be the same here. I will leave wiki as it is clear the level of prejudice you hold, but I reiterate, I will be sharing this experience in writing, audio and video across my social media and I imagine this will be picked up fairy quickly by the UK press. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinemaseats (talk • contribs)
 * Well as an American, I look forward to you wasting money on your completely basless attempt at litigation. Cheers. Face-smile.svg PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)