User talk:CinephileChristian

Welcome!
Hello, CinephileChristian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Introduction to referencing
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2001: A Space Odyssey (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DarkAudit (talk) 08:27, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2001: A Space Odyssey (film). 10mmsocket (talk) 08:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi CinephileChristian and welcome to Wikipedia. As mentioned above please remember that all edits require reliable sources before they can be included in articles. It's also important to read through the entire article before editing it, as something you wish to add might already be included elsewhere. For instance the article on Lord of the Rings, which you recently edited, already contains the information that the film was made in New Zealand. So there's no need to add this again, as you did a couple of times. If you're new to editing it might be worthwhile to try out some of the links in the welcome template left on this userpage. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Koos de la Rey have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:58, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Koos de la Rey was changed by CinephileChristian (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952653 on 2023-06-20T10:58:28+00:00

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Normandy landings, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Normandy landings. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your edits: -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) 11:18, 20 June 2023
 * 2) 13:05, 21 June 2023
 * 3) 13:11, 21 June 2023

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 06:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)