User talk:Cintendo

C'est Ne Pas Bon
If you are not going to expand the C'est Bon XX articles substantially, can I suggest that you should list each issue as part of the master article? I'm absolutely sure they'll all be deleted if you do not. --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * BTW, I'm going to assume that you're Cin Iwarsson. Beware WP:COI --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

The article C'est Bon 1 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. There should not be separate articles for each issue of a magazine. NawlinWiki 14:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

I have listed the separate issues of C'est Bon for speedy deletion, suggested the C'est Bon article be merged with C'est Bon Kultur article, and tagged the C'est Bon Kultur article with various issues. If you wish to dispute the speedy deletions, the means to do so are noted in the tags on the respective pages. If you wish to dispute the merge, note your reasons on the talk page for that article. Please make edits to the C'est Bon Kultur to address the issues noted in the tags. Improbcat 14:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)


 * There you go. I predict the future... --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)