User talk:Circeus/january-march2009

Stilk v Myrick
Thanks for your cleanup here; what was with the removal of the 'see also' section? Ironholds (talk) 21:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent, thanks for the explanation. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 02:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Grady Nutt
Thanks for your details about the aircraft Nutt was in when he crashed. However, I'm trying to have all specific facts cited. Could you cite the information (or give me the info and I'll site it). I couldn't verify it through my resources. Thanks again. SonPraises (talk) (contributions) 05:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia naming conventions for organisms
Hi, Circeus, more policy wonking:

I suggest that Wikipedia should change its naming conventions for organism articles to require scientific names, and this suggestion should be discussed fully at Wikipedia naming conventions. --KP Botany (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Interested in a challenge?
Hi, Circeus;

If you're interested in a copyediting challenge, I've got Edmontosaurus. The text itself should be reasonably clean, but the article's length is a bit more than I'd anticipated when I started. J. Spencer (talk) 02:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Hudson Highlands MRA
I'd use the full title. Those three properties were never listed in the first place due to objections by their owners (from what I've been able to tell). Similar concerns kept St. Philip's Church in the Highlands from being listed for over ten years (notice it has an 82 number but wasn't listed until 1995). Daniel Case (talk) 09:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Imposter trevally
--Dravecky (talk) 08:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Bluespotted trevally
--Dravecky (talk) 08:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Churches and places of worship in Brighton and Hove
Many thanks for picking up the errors, which I've now corrected. Please do keep an eye on the article as I continue to revamp it: with such a large list, with a mixture of new and existing material, there could be more omissions or mistakes. By the way, in case I eventually put this forward at Featured Lists, do you think Roughwood is a reliable source? (This is the main Brighton Churches page.) I've tried to use it as little as possible, but some instances remain to back up certain facts etc. I'm undecided as to its Wiki-reliability. Cheers, Hassocks  5489 (tickets please!)  20:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

invitation
You're invited to sign up as a founding member, at WikiProject Council/Proposals ! :) doncram (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up on this, Circeus. I have put my name down and look forward to seeing what happens next.  Thanks also for recent comments on the churches list; the pipe-organs article is worth a paragraph in the lead (and obviously a wikilink), I think.   Hassocks  5489 (tickets please!)  14:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Years in taxobox
Hi Circeus, I notice you keep removing the species year from the taxobox in mushroom articles I write, I was wondering what the rationale was for this? I checked the taxobox usage page, and couldn't find a statement for or against this practice, and some of the example given do have years given (while others don't). Is there any harm giving this additional information? Sasata (talk) 16:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Anwar
Hey,

A user you blocked recently has returned causing more trouble and after failing to win an argument has put me up for trial at.

I feel that this User: Anwar saadat has decided to pursue a case after understanding what he has been doing is wrong. You may check his recent edit history, where he has altered GAs and long-term stable articles causing edit wars involving several users. Furthermore what comes as a shock, is that he is going against Wikiproject:Indian cinema and deleting whole sections of GA articles, claiming they "are unneccessary to him". More recently, he has been stalking my edits and has been trying to frame me out in every single way possible through images. I find it shocking, how this can continue!

In a personal claim, I find it quite shocking to see why he is still editing, looking at his edit history - he has been BLOCKED twenty one times and has been allowed to continue to stay on and edit inconstructively. Moreover in his time, he has been blocked for : '''disruption, stalking, WP:3RR, gross violations, racist abuse, trolling, anti-Hindu remarks in extremist favour of Islam, straight reverting and sockpuppetry. I cannot believe, why he is still editing. I'm sure that racism alone is enough to get one permanently blocked, and with over 20 blocks, I'm very shocked. Hopefully you could help, get rid of him once and for all.

Moreover, I think this edit sums this character up. Here, try not to laugh!!!

Cheers. Universal Hero (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)