User talk:Circulationsys

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Circulationsys, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Ediacara biota. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! mgiganteus1 (talk) 09:29, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion
Hello, Circulationsys. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Dougweller (talk) 08:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Circulationsys I suggest you read WP:FRINGE, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS, IRWolfie- (talk) 10:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Major not minor
Do not mark major edits as minor edits, IRWolfie- (talk) 10:55, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring
Please do not try and edit war your content into the article. Discuss your addition on the relevant talk page, IRWolfie- (talk) 23:29, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Rosagammarus
Hello. A few months ago you removed the reference to Rosagammarus minichiellus from the Amphipoda article, stating that Fossil interpretation has been revised. Could you provide your source for this? Regards --Macrochelys (talk) 19:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Circulationsys, we would still be curious to know the basis of revising the view about that species and publication (McMenamin, Zapata & Hussey 2013). Is there any reference to that? Best wishes --Ttjew (talk) 23:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Greetings! Several independent research groups are re-examining Rosagammarus and supposedly a joint abstract is forthcoming. I will post here when I have the citation. Best, Circulationsys (talk) 00:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Here is the citation. I heard mention that in spite of the revised interpretation, this is still the best arthropod fossil found so far in the Luning Formation of Nevada. https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2015NC/webprogram/Paper256121.html Circulationsys (talk) 00:59, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update! --Ttjew (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

A note about your contributions
Hello there! I've noticed your contributions are largely centered around the paleontologist Mark McMenamin and his research. You've contributed extensively to the biographical article, and have often added McMenamin citations to articles, sometimes with apparent original synthesis such as here, or undue weight towards McMenamin's work. While I assume your contributions are good faith efforts to improve the encyclopedia, your edit history suggests you may be connected in some way to the person (deepest apologies if I am wrong), and I would remind you of relevant policies and guidelines such as Conflict of interest, WP:PROMOTION, WP:SELFPROMOTION, as well as WP:NPOV and WP:FRINGE. Certainly there are cases where McMenamin is very appropriate to cite or mention, others, arguably less-so, or only with due weight and context. Whether you are a colleague of, student of, friend of, or the subject himself-- or even if you have no connection whatsoever to the subject-- care should be taken to ensure your contributions are in line with neutrality, balance, and objectivity, not selective, or one-sided, or unduly focused, at the risk of resembling a single purpose account. I am not accusing you of any egregious wrongdoing, only reminding you of the importance of adhering to the above guidelines, in any Wikipedia article. You might also discuss significant edits on Talk pages before making them, especially if they could reasonably be interpreted as a contentious, biased, or an extreme minority view. All the best, --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Homo tsaichangensis Reference
Hi! I cannot find this reference. Has it been published yet? Where can I find it? Thanks, jonkerz ♠talk 14:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

The reference that you are seeking may be found here, circulationsys♠talk https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301215826_Prijegled_osnovnih_taksonomskih_podataka_o_evoluciji_covjeka_Homo_sapiens_Linnaeus_1758_Chordata_Mammalia_Primates_Hominidae
 * Thanks! I've added the original Bosnian title to the article. If I may ask, what's your relation to Mark McMenamin and his research? jonkerz ♠talk 12:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)