User talk:Citationfind

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted the article because Your only edits under this account name are the query on my talk page and to nominate a rival newspaper's article for deletion too. You also said It wasn't advertising anything when it was clearly a fact-free promotion. If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the publishing company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. The article had no references of any kind, and therefore no verifiable facts. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * There are no facts such as verified circulation, awards etc to show that it meets the notability criteria linked above
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: the largest circulated amongst all the Sindhi & regional dailies... one of the finest and most efficient news and distribution networks in the country... caters to all kinds of readers... an exclusive touch seen in no other Sindhi language daily... large number of overseas subscribers... Sindhi newspapers have not received the recognition they deserve... Daily Ibrat's news and coverage has said to have been at an equal standard pure spam, and it even tells us the price, just in case we have overlooked what a sales pitch this is.

Since this is a new account, it may be that you have edited under another user name. While that is permitted, note that the abuse of multiple accounts can lead to a block. Abuse can include creating an account to hide a previous editing history or a COI

I'm not going to restore the article; it has no verifiable facts and is highly promotional. Given that you have no editing history and may have a COI, I have no reason to believe that you have the competence or neutrality to make something encyclopaedic from this mess.

You could rewrite from scratch, but before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above

The fact that other articles have not been deleted doesn't help you, either they met the criteria or should be deleted as well. See other stuff exists. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  08:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)