User talk:Citizen of New York

Welcome!

Hello, Citizen of New York, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as United States defined, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Top Jim (talk) 19:05, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your contributed article, United States defined
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, United States defined. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Citizenship in the United States. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Citizenship in the United States - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 22:34, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

'''  Its NO surprise that you have no information explaining the information I have provided and you have deliberately side stepped my efforts of good information based on facts of the Supreme Court of these united States of America. Thank you for providing the proof I needed to publish in papers and promote on my T.V. show. You shall be deemed in all my publishings as a tyrannical organization aiding in the oppression of the Americas. Which is no different than the animals breeding with the Rothschild, J. P. Morgans, Rockefeller etcetera.'''

Note
As your sole purpose here appears to be to push a fringe viewpoint and to attack other editors, I have reported you to the appropriate authorities. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Your sole purpose here appears to be attack other editors and push your agenda.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 14:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

{UNBLOCK ME} Its outrageous that I offer useful and accurate information and get blocked. I question the motives and express my opinions to those who pre-judge and badger me.

Then you want to block me; when I offer accurate and useful information. I receive lies pertaining to the existence of information like mine; yet it does not exist.

The I'm targeted by fictitious watchdogs making absurd claims against me.

My information is verifiable, supported and documented. Yet it is still blocked. Yes this will make for good journalism supporting the claims I've been receiving.


 * "Exposing the Hippocrates"??? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 17:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

What you can't read either Baseball butts? Is this all you do? Just flag and block people offering factual information for others to learn and find easier? By the way, who the hell are you and what do you want?
 * I can read, and I observed that you can't spell. As regards blocks: I block everyone who's in my power to block. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Take your head out of your ass, crawl out of your mother's basement then go fuck yourself. If you were here; I'd bitch slap you and take your lunch money too.
 * Your comments immediately above sound vaguely familiar. What ID did you used to edit under? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked. The Wordsmith Communicate 18:14, 21 October 2010 (UTC)