User talk:Cityzen05

March 2021
Hello, I'm DanCherek. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 13:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 was changed by Cityzen05 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954725 on 2021-03-16T13:59:34+00:00

Sorry Dan, but I have to disagree with you. Clayson was in the film and I feel this was importantly left out. Cityzen05 (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Herne Bay, you may be blocked from editing.   Ashley  yoursmile!  14:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)