User talk:Civil124

March 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Week, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Zim Zala Bim talk 21:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)


 * How can it be original research?? Rev 1:10 literally says "I was in the spirit on the Lord’s day", yet you have the original research "Bible verse Rev. 1:10 says it's the day Jesus was raised from the dead", which is an outright lie, regarless of personal interpretations. Civil124 (talk) 00:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Besides, the Wikipedia article on the Lord's day says exactly what I added to the text, is Wikipedia not a "reliable source"? Civil124 (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * As I said in the edit summary, feel free to discuss that content in the article's talk page. But to answer your question: actually, no, Wikipedia is not itself a reliable source. -- Zim Zala Bim talk 02:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)