User talk:CivilRightsandWrongs

September 2017
Hello, I'm Timawesomeness. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kate Millett seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. timawesomeness ⟨ talk ⟩ 05:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

__NOINDEX__

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:timawesomeness, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Attacking people is not an acceptable way to handle a dispute. timawesomeness  ⟨ talk ⟩ 08:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

__NOINDEX__

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. timawesomeness ⟨ talk ⟩ 09:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Millett. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Redgro (talk) 10:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Millett, you may be blocked from editing. Redgro (talk) 10:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — Maile (talk) 11:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

ANI 2
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Instantmatter49 (talk) 04:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)