User talk:Cj94112

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lucas Cruikshank, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 03:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 03:23, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

thank you for pointing this out. However I feel that some of my edits were valid for reasons mentioned on the banner. The accusations of vandalism may bee from my lack of edit explanation. Please tell me your reasoning for reverting my edits and I will try my hardest to adhere to stricter standards. Thank you.
 * What banner? It doesn't seem like any of your edits, other than your latest which I only noticed because I edit-conflicted leaving this message, have been valid. Which do you feel were? How, in any way, do you think that something like this is a constructive edit? --Onorem♠Dil 03:54, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm. Well this was not what i meant to do. I agree with your challange on this. I was attempting to make the stub banner very visable so as to grab the attention of someone with valuable knowalage on the subject. I assure you it will not happen again. Thank you for your contribution to the continued refinement of my editing practices.

History of the Socialist Left Party
Hi. You signed up to copy edit History of the Socialist Left Party on 8th November, but appear only to have made minor changes to the first couple of sections and added a copyedit tag (unnecessary, since a copy edit had already been requested). Are you planning to continue working on it? If not, the continued presence of your working tag against its entry on the GOCE Requests page is probably preventing anyone else taking it on, and delaying the requester's work. Please could you make your plans known? Regards, --Stfg (talk) 17:36, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello. As you have been off wiki for three weeks now, I will take over that copy edit, so that the requester can progress. Regards. --Stfg (talk) 11:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)