User talk:Cjestaz

Welcome!
Hello, Cjestaz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Leadership for Learning: The Cambridge Network, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Captain Conundrum (talk) 13:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Leadership for Learning: The Cambridge Network


A tag has been placed on Leadership for Learning: The Cambridge Network, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Captain Conundrum (talk) 13:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Leadership for Learning: The Cambridge Network, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Captain Conundrum (talk) 14:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Leadership for Learning: The Cambridge Network. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.  Yinta n  14:17, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Leadership for Learning: The Cambridge Network


A tag has been placed on Leadership for Learning: The Cambridge Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/centres/lfl/about/lfl%20principles-explanatory%20text.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Forward  Unto   Dawn  10:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I think we are still some way off. What you have written is not a third-person encyclopaedia article, but a first person opinion piece. Although you give a reference, it is an academic paper with no on-line link, so we can't check whether it is supporting every point you make. It's also not an independent verifiable sources, needed to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. if your only reference is written by involved people, it doesn't indicate notability. I think you need specific in-line references to independent sources to support what look to me to be statements of opinion rather than fact. Eg ''have been used in a wide variety of contexts to frame discussions and to inform the evaluation of practice... a set of democratic values about leadership and learning... they began to identify ‘principles for practice’ that would help to clarify and focus attention on the transformations in learning and leadership that were beginning to take place... The most significant outcome of the project... These five principles are dynamically interrelated, with dialogue forming the connections, a focus on learning and shared leadership mediated by conditions for learning, and all framed by the fifth principle of accountability. ‘A focus on learning’ is quite deliberately placed first because it can be considered as the prime principle, reflecting a commitment to making learning the number one priority – the core of Leadership for Learning. Each headline principle is elaborated through sub-principles that amplify and illustrate...'' and so on...

At present, the lack of independent sources, the non-encyclopaedic first-person tone, and lack of facts mean it is likely that it would be deleted again. Remember that this is not a free platform for your organisation, it is a resource that anyone can edit.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)