User talk:Cjmungai

In-Mold Decoration by Roller
What's required is real, reliable sources about the process, namely media coverage — if the only source you can provide is an animated video on the website of the company that invented the process in the first place, then that's what makes it "advertising". For the record, speedy deletion doesn't mean that the topic can never have an article — it just can't have that version of the article. If you can write a better version that cites better sources, then you're always free to do so. Bearcat (talk) 05:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia's core requirement for an article is that the topic is verifiable in reliable sources. Having a Wikipedia article isn't an entitlement, and we're not the place to promote new concepts and ideas and processes that haven't garnered that verifiable media coverage yet. I'd request that you actually read the policy pages that I've linked to, because I'm not being difficult just for kicks — we actually do have a non-negotiable core policy stating that if you can't cite reliable, independent sources, then the topic just doesn't qualify for an article whether it wants one or not. Notability on Wikipedia is defined as a factor of whether there are valid, reliable and independent sources present in the article to demonstrate that the topic has already garnered coverage from people other than us, not merely whether you can demonstrate that the topic exists. Until such sources exist, the company's best route to a Wikipedia article continues to be to market itself to organizations (newspapers, magazines, etc.) that can provide the kind of coverage that we need; we're not an appropriate or useful place to seek that kind of media attention. Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 29 March 2011 (UTC)