User talk:Cjosefy

Updates to Baylor University article
I have been working on a number of articles and items related to Baylor University including the main Baylor University article. Also, I am still learning proper etiquette and culture here on wiki. Several days ago I edited in two places in the article the total number of staff, faculty, and students. I think you changed those numbers back to what they had been previously. I would like for us to arrive at the best way to get these numbers updated.

804 is the faculty number cited in several university reference documents, but those documents make clear that this number is for AAUP defined faculty and does not include library faculty. I included a reference to the 2006 Fall Facts which shows that there are 31 additional faculty members from the library bringing the total faculty count to 835. The later referenced document in the article under reports total faculty and that is explained in the document. The same report that I cite above provides a ocunt of total staff at the university.

The student enrollment data that is now reported in the article is from the Fall 2006 enrollment information. New reports showing Spring 2007 enrollment figures have been released. I may well have cited the wrong report and numbers in my update. That doesn't really matter to me now. I just want to get the right info out there. This is the Spring 2007 enrollment report. Is it most common to report total headcount on enrollment or total FTE?

I believe that it would be more accurate to reflect the numbers from the reports that I mention above within the article. I am looking for guidance and a way for us to avoid bouncing back and forth between the new and old numbers. Please excuse any malaprops that I may have made in this communication. As I said above, I am new to the environment and culture and appreciate any guidance. Thanks --RKWoodruff 02:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

STS-115
Thanks for pointing out my (rather large) mistake. :) Palebluedots 20:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

The Smashing Pumpkins
I would just like to say nice job on the SP page. Thanks alot for uploading those promo photos too, thats awesome. I think now we have enough images to completely rid of the album covers, especially since I completed the Post break-up project I had. -- Reaper  X  03:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, thats awesome. Could you please upload the photo from Machina/Machines of God (promo) too? -- Janadore 19:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Space Shuttle Atlantis
Hi, thanks for undoing Rebecca's revert of my date edit at Space Shuttle Atlantis. You may be aware of this, but she has promised several different editors that she will revert each such edits. If you look at her contributions, you will see that she has used the admin rollback tool to do exactly that.

Several editors are also complaining to her about incivility. See her talk page, and comments she has made elsewhere. Regards. bobblewik 18:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Tucson Toros memorabilia
Hi, and thanks for stopping by my Talk page. I'm not aware of our having any Eusebio equipment, although there may be a cracked bat in there with his name on it. We bought a helmet and a few other things at the time of the name change, but I don't have rosters from 1993 and earlier for looking up numbers, so in some cases we never know whose stuff it was. I did have an Orlando Miller Javalinas jacket, but to my lasting distress I lost it somewhere about five years ago. A least one of the Jerseys is Chris Hatcher, but I don't really remember, if I ever knew, who else is represented. We started going to Toros games around July 1993, so we didn't have all that much chance to see Eusebio before he was promoted to Houston. Regards. Karen | Talk | contribs 19:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Bill Murray
Hi, can you upload the pics to commons, so that i can put it in ther others wikipedias?--Domingo Portales 20:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

re: Mayonaise -> Mayonnaise
The Smashing Pumpkins song is intentionally spelled as "Mayonaise" as opposed to Mayonnaise. I noticed this was changed on The Smashing Pumpkins discography. I'm not sure it it was changed on any other pages. Cjosefy 14:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for that. I've added that article to my exception list. Cheers, CmdrObot 15:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AnEveningWithJohnDenver.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AnEveningWithJohnDenver.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FarewellAndromeda.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FarewellAndromeda.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:The Metro Chicago.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:The Metro Chicago.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 23:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Wrigley Field Sign.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Wrigley Field Sign.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 00:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mashed Potatoes (album)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mashed Potatoes (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:SCH Logo Vert Color.jpg)
You've uploaded File:SCH Logo Vert Color.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Sts-116-temp.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sts-116-temp.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Chris  00:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Light into Dark for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Light into Dark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Light into Dark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lachlanusername (talk) 23:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Last Song (The Smashing Pumpkins song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Last Song (The Smashing Pumpkins song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Last Song (The Smashing Pumpkins song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lachlanusername (talk) 23:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Smashing pumpkins still becoming apart.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Smashing pumpkins still becoming apart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Live at Cabaret Metro 10-5-88 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live at Cabaret Metro 10-5-88 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Live at Cabaret Metro 10-5-88 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LF (talk) 04:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Repossessed.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Repossessed.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Smashing pumpkins 2000 promo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Smashing pumpkins 2000 promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 18:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Baylorsign brotherspg.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Better source request for File:GeorgePShultz.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:GeorgePShultz.jpg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Smashing pumpkins 1998 promo.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Smashing pumpkins 1998 promo.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:GeorgePShultz.jpg


The file File:GeorgePShultz.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Starchildren for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Starchildren, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Starchildren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)