User talk:Cjp0001/sandbox

Peer review: Looks good so far, the article appears to be neutral. The citation links work, do not seem biased, and support the statements given. The information present is relevant to the topic. Some of the citations seem like they are outdated and should be replaced; similarly, there are sentences that make claims without a citation. Words like amniocentesis could have a link or explanation so readers know what that means. Overall a very interesting and informative article. Mrp0007 (talk) 00:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)mrp0007