User talk:Ck lostsword/Archive/Archive 4

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Age of Empires 3, Civilization table
I inserted a new table table with the civilization details ; but this table is better than the previouse, since:


 * It is more basic; without too many details


 * It is not so unstable; it has better appearance and is shorter, not so gigantic.


 * The flags are the real game flags, and not other flags which are similiar.


 * It is similiar to the one in the Age of Empires III: The Warchiefs article, which recieves no negative critism.

--TomasBat 01:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

NPWatcher approval
You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give me any feature requests or bugs. I'm also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if I've made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist).  Finally, enjoy! Mart inp23  13:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Age of Empires III: Copyedit change
I do not understand why you deleted all of this information on the explorer and... what do you mean by copyedit?

--TomasBat (Talk) 22:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Uploaded Image
Hi. I have uploaded an image which shows an Ottoman Home City but I have been notified that if I do not provide more information on the summary box within 48 hours, the image would be deleted... Could you somehow please help me out...

The image is the following: Image:Age of Empires III HomeCity Ottomans.jpg

Note: For more information, please see my talk page.

--TomasBat (Talk) 01:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Age of Empires III Units Diagram.jpg
Hi Ck. I just thought you should know that your screenshot is the selected picture at the very new and under construction Portal:Strategy Games. · A ndonic O Talk · Sign Here 11:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, someone said it couldn't be used because of the licensing. Too bad, it was nice. · A ndonic O Talk · Sign Here 12:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. :-) · A ndonic O Talk · Sign Here 10:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

What?
I did not vandalize page Dred Scott v. Sandford. It was 209.66.220.213 who added random letters to the page. I simply undid the edit. I think we just had a bit of an edit conflict, and vandal proof thought I was the vandal.

Can you please remove the warning when you review it, please? Thanks! --24.136.230.38 16:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

About 'Ancient Britons' and 'Celts'
I hope that this is the right way to contact you. I am the one who's editing of the article 'Ancient Britons' you just removed. Admittedly, it was a rather 'nasty' way of drawing attention to the fact that this article is indeed complete rubbish! I HAD left this message for about a month on the discussion-page, but nothing happened, so... READ what I wrote...

Admittedly the mix-up of Ancient Britons and Celts has been made before.

But it would be as if you wrote an article entitled 'Native peoples of the American continent' and then wrote about early settlers in the new world!

At first I had considered deleting the article altogether, which would have been the best thing to do, but, I tought, would have been considered vandalism!

By the way, I studied History (Though medieval and not about the age the article is (Or should have been) about), and DO know my 'Ancient Britons' from my 'Celts' 81.245.162.33 22:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

P.S.: A better way had been to tag the article, asking for a complete review and explaining why. But I did not know how to do that. After having signalled the 'Rubbishness' of the article on the discussion-page, to no avail, for almost a month, I had to do SOMETHING to draw attention the the fact that the content of the article is completely wrong and depicting an ancient people completely different (And much younger) than that suggested by the title of the article 81.245.162.33 22:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. I even left you a barnstar.  Amos Han  Talk 21:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I am going to turn the section that got vandalized, into a userbox so that it would be harder to vandalize.  Amos Han  Talk 21:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Jews Live in Pelham Parkway
This is a fact. I am a Jew who lived there. 67.87.92.56 21:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Are you serious? You ask me to support my assertion with citations? Fine. There a synagogues all over the place --orthodox shuls. Citations must be referenced for the assertion that Albanians live there too. 67.87.92.56 21:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Reverted Edits
You reverted the edits I made to the Rule of Rose talk page. Please refrain from doing this, as it is messing up our discussion on the link in question.67.163.193.239 20:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Please Stop
Also, the reason I delete my talk page is because nearly all of the warnings were unfair or spam from trolls who think I am someone else. It's a long story. I already posted a notice about it on the admin board. Please stop reverting my deletions. I have checked the guidelines and they clearly state that it is allowed for a person to delete content on there own pages. Please respect my wishes. I am sick of being spammed and harassed by people. Check out the noticeboard. I'd post a link, but I have no idea how.67.163.193.239 21:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the GA review, sorry if i came across a bit rude at first, but i got what you meant when you elaborated. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by M3tal H3ad (talk • contribs) 10:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Thanks again :) M3tal H3ad 14:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Seymour Knox GA on hold
Was this what you had in mind? TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 21:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Age of Empires
You may have noticed that Wikiproject Age of Empires was recently classed as inactive. As you are a current member of the project, I would like to know if you are still considering participating in the project. It would also be great if you could refer some new members to the project, if you find anyone suitable for it. Thanks! ~ G1ggy!  Reply 04:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Age of Empires III Units Diagram.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Age of Empires III Units Diagram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

GAC backlog elimination drive
This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :GAReview underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. --Nehrams2020 01:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Birthday - moved

 * Yes, happy birthday, and good luck on you RfA. Dfrg.msc 07:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)