User talk:Ckallday10

Welcome!
Hello, Ckallday10, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Your edit to "Aries (astrology)"
I have reverted your edit to Aries (astrology). Since you are a university student you will be aware of the need for reliable sources. You will also be aware of the need to provide citations in the format that applies to the publication or class for which you are writing.

The web site you cited, Astrology-zodiac-signs.com, presents astrology as if it were true (although they acknowledge on their home page that the part of astrology that interprets the meanings of the positions of the celestial bodies is an art, not a science). But astrology is pseudo-science, and Wikipedia has a policy that addresses pseudo-science. This does, of course, make it hard to write about topics like astrology because most of the publications that express belief in it are not reliable source, so cannot be used. Indeed, there is probably a good deal of material in the article that should be removed.

Wikipedia also has a guideline about citing sources. In brief, it says to use the format that has been established for the article. The format for the astrology articles is to create an entry for the source in the "Works cited" section, and then create a footnote that gives details about what part of the source is used (for example, what pages in a book) an which links to the main entry under "Works cited". If your source were acceptable, the full description would have been created with this template:



It would have appeared in the article like this:



Then, right after the claim that the citation supports, you would create a footnote like this

(This uses the sfn template, which stands for short footnote.)

Jc3s5h (talk) 02:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)