User talk:Ckckhcdc

Welcome!
Hello, Ckckhcdc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! The Bushranger One ping only 06:29, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please do not add uncited material to Wikipedia
Please do not add uncited material to Wikipedia. Any information that you add to the encyclopedia must include a citation from a reliable source. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies detailed in the "Welcome" post you received above on this page in May. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 04:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Lisa Su
Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia. However, much or most of the information you are adding to the Lisa Su infobox is not appropriate, and has been removed. If you would like me to explain in more detail, let me know. Meanwhile, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 04:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)


 * First, AMD is not a major "software" company to begin with. Can you just check it with Wikipedia. AMD is a major "hardware" company.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Micro_Devices


 * Second, let's just assume AMD "is" a software company. To have birth name, spouse name, and parents names listed in the infobox are very typical among many well-known software company executives.  Such as:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Ellison https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satya_Nadella


 * So you are saying they are all wrong?


 * Hi Ckckhcdc. I'm happy to discuss this with you. Please remember to sign your Talk page posts by using four tildes ( ~ ), and also indent your posts with colons so that they nest properly under the post you are replying to (I have done that for you above). Obviously I did not mean software company. Which reminds me, please remember to leave an edit summary each time you make an edit on Wikipedia.


 * Concerning the Lisa Su article: The article is less than 300 words long. If you would like to add to the article, please do not add trivia, but rather add information to the body text, in order of importance: of first importance would be professional history; of second importance would be educational history; of least importance would be early life. And so on. If you do add any information to the Lisa Su article, please make sure you add a confirming citation, and for items I listed, they should be English citations. Please do not add Chinese characters to the article. If you would like to create an article on Lisa Su on the Mandarin Wikipedia, you are welcome to do that, and then to link it to the English wiki article.


 * I hope this helps. PS: You do not need to alert me on my Talk page; I have your Talk page on my Watch list and I will see when you post here. Softlavender (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Warnings
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Lisa Su. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Softlavender (talk) 04:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Third opinion request
Thank you for listing your dispute at Third opinion. Your request did not follow the guidelines for listing disputes. These guidelines are in place because they make sure that the editor who writes the Third Opinion is not biased, and that (s)he can easily see what the dispute is about.

The description of the dispute should be concise and neutral, and you should sign with the timestamp only. A concise and neutral description means that only the subject matter of the dispute should be described, and not your (nor anyone else's) views on it. For example, in a dispute about reliable sources, do not write "He thinks this source is unreliable", but rather write "Dispute about the reliability of a source". To sign with only the timestamp, and without your username, use five tildes instead of four.

Your request for a Third Opinion may have been edited by another editor to follow the guidelines - feel free to edit it again if necessary. If the dispute is of such a nature that it cannot follow the guidelines, another part of the dispute resolution process may be able to help you. For example, Wikiquette alerts is a good place to alert others to a particular editor's behaviour. Thank you for opting to use the dispute resolution process. Also, there should be a lengthy discussion on the article in disputes talk page, before dispute resolution is requested. — Lightgodsy (TALK CONT ) 10:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)