User talk:Ckuelzow

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Impedance Mismatch Problem, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! -- &asymp; jossi fresco &asymp; 17:40, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

If you continue to add copyrighted information to wikipedia, this account will be blocked. Fawcett5 17:52, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Structured Key Information Enterprise Repository (SKIER) article
The content was speedy deleted several times because it was copyright violation. I haven't found your statements regarding this content not being copyrighted, so I can't speak to that. Wikipedia must defend itself against potential copyright violations. There is a policy in place to deal with this, WP:CSD #8. If you would please provide assertion/proof of permission, then the content can be placed here. However, please keep in mind that in so doing it is then subject to the terms of GFDL, and is no longer 'owned' by you. Please make comments regarding this article at Articles for deletion/Structured Key Information Enterprise Repository (SKIER), as it is up for deletion. I think this article will need to greatly expand in order for it to pass it's vote on the AfD page. What is its relevance? Where does it fit in within the context of scientific study? Who are the main proponents and what is their expertise? Etc..etc..etc.. Also, please sign any comments you make on non-article pages by add a ~ to the end of them, or clicking on the second button from the right on the buttons at the top of the editing window. All the best, --Durin 18:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Please sign your comments
Please sign any comments you make on non-article pages by add a  to the end of them, or clicking on the second button from the right on the buttons at the top of the editing window. This is important to aid users in seeing your comment with a time stamp to place in context, and for allowing them an easy route to communicate with you. --Durin 15:00, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Take a look at impedance mismatch
Nice job. I found this article more intelligible than SKIER. It is actually a widely useful concept I did not have a word for. So I added an opening paragraph and modified the second paragraph for you for a couple of purposes. First, cooperative editing feels different than ordinary editing when you realize that literally anyone can alter an article you wrote. I may have introduced an error, or changed a phrase of yours to a way I preferred. Second, I tried to give an example of what I meant by an orienting intro paragraph for a novice reader. I have never heard of this term before you started this article. Is my paragraph a fair intro, or did I misunderstand your more concise and advanced description? Feel free to correct the paragraph. In fact, if you are offended by the idea that I might presume to change "your" article despite my profession of ignorance about your subject, wikipedia might be a stressful and unpleasant place for you. In this case I have no intention of disputing any changes you might make in turn (because I basically have nothing invested in this particular topic), but if you thought I might, you might leave a message on the talk:impedance mismatch page to explain your change. I might agree or might express disagreement. Anyway, you get the idea. I will check the article to see if I completely missed the point of your original version (but if so, it should give you some clues as to how to make yours clearer). Happy editing. alteripse 00:08, 14 October 2005 (UTC)