User talk:Ckunitsky

Welcome!

 * }

Thank you for your work on PLFA; please follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines
Your contributions to the PLFA article have been considerable. However, you have, I am sorry to say, failed to follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines and are removing the work of others which do so (both those that worked on the article before you and my efforts). Moreover, you are failing to respond to any attempt to communicate and are generally acting as if Wikipedia were your private wiki in which you were the sole one legitimately editing an article; YOU DO NOT OWN THIS ARTICLE. I don't want to call in administrative intervention to get you blocked from editing, but I'm beginning to think that's the only thing you'll pay attention to. I apologize for putting this message out of order on your talk page, but I'm trying to make sure you'll see it. Allens (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
I apologize for putting in the below prior to the full Welcome! message. Allens (talk) 19:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Phospholipid-derived fatty acids, makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Allens (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Phospholipid-derived fatty acids, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Allens (talk) 19:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Phospholipid-derived fatty acids, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''In particular, you are refusing to have a lead section as is required by Wikipedia standards. You are also refusing to respond to messages, failing to post reasons for changes in the edit summaries, removing maintenance templates, and generally removing anything anyone else does to this article.'' Allens (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Phospholipid-derived fatty acids‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are assuming ownership of this article, by refusing to allow others to edit it (reverting/removing their contributions), not following the manual of style and removing contributions from others that try to make the article follow it, refusing to respond to messages, failing to put in edit summaries, and deleting maintenance templates without fixing the problem pointed out. Allens (talk) 13:53, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Ckunitsky. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

WQA notice
Hello, Ckunitsky. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Gerardw (talk) 15:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Ckunitsky, might I offer you a word of advice? I noticed that you have never responded to any comments on the article talk page or here on your own talk page.  It is really important that you discuss things. You see, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that means that two editors often end up disagreeing about what should be in an article. If you refuse to talk things out, how can we ever reach agreement?


 * Talking things over isn't optional. It is a requirement. If you continue on the path you are on, Wikipedia has a way of dealing with that sort of misbehavior - by blocking you from editing Wikipedia. Nobody wants that. So please start discussing things, starting with replying to this.  Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 16:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
In their signature, after their name is the word "talk". Click on this to go to their talk page. Click on the "Add new section" tab at the top of the pafe and a form comes up to enter a heading and content. Don't forget to sign your comment by clicking on the signature icon

filceolaire (talk) 00:37, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)