User talk:Cladilecce

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:54, 14 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I have globally renamed ChristGantenbein to Cladilecce, and someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

I am considering this request, but your response to the questions still makes me uneasy. It seems that you intend to mostly edit in areas which at least skirt around a conflict of interest, if not directly involve it and you don't really seem to understand that you shouldn't make edits to articles where you have such a conflict of interest. GoldenRing (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Is disclosing one's conflict of interest not enough if one wishes to create a page that is useful for the encyclopedia and not of marketing/promotional nature?Cladilecce (talk) 15:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep in mind that usefulness is not the metric by which we determine what content Wikipedia has; notability determines what merits an article here. Something can be very useful but be totally inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Many businesses, for example, think it is very useful to them and their customers to create an article about themselves, but we only have articles about businesses that meet the notability guidelines for businesses(WP:ORG). 331dot (talk) 15:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Christ & Gantenbein fully meets the criteria notability, since they have built two public museums in Switzerland:Swiss National Museum as well as Kunstmuseum Basel, as well as a folly in the public sculpture park Jinhua Architecture Park in collaboration with artist Ai Weiwei. Moreover they are Full Professors of Architecture at ETH Zurich Faculty of Architecture. So beyond been a business they play an important social and cultural role in their country as well as internationally. Cladilecce (talk) 16:13, 2 April 2019 (UTC)