User talk:Claidheamhmor

License tagging for Image:SterkfonteinCaves1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SterkfonteinCaves1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 10:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello,, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style Also, make test edits in the sandbox I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ). If you need help, please see our help pages.--WelcomeMachine 10:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: GTO123
I tried reporting GTO123 back in February, but nothing came of it. Feel free to make another report on WP:ANI since he obviously isn't learning from the warnings. swa q  18:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Max Bygraves
Please don't insert unsourced material into a Wikipedia article as you did in the Max Bygraves article. The material was removed for the very good reason that it was unsourced and had been tagged for 2 years as lacking sourcing. I reverted your edit. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, though I see a good bit of the material was actually sourced in the linked websites in the article. Claidheamhmor (talk) 06:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure which linked websites you mean. IMDb is not a reliable source. And his own website can only be used for limited things. See WP:BLPSPS.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:35, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Echo Caves
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Claidheamhmor, thanks for creating Echo Caves!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add inline citations to verify the stated facts in this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 10:46, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Nick, I'll be doing some more editing and finding of better sources. Claidheamhmor (talk) 13:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Joy Ellis moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Joy Ellis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 14:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joy Ellis has been accepted
 Joy Ellis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MurielMary (talk) 03:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Joy_Ellis help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

M.W. Craven moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, M.W. Craven, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently it is entirely sourced with primary refs, which are not eligible to be used to show he meets notability criteria. What you need are in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable sources. The CWA award, while nice, is not enough on its own to show notability. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:M. W. Craven
Hello, Claidheamhmor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:M. W. Craven, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:M. W. Craven


Hello, Claidheamhmor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "M. W. Craven".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:M. W. Craven has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:M. W. Craven. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: M. W. Craven has been accepted
 M. W. Craven, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=M._W._Craven help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! SL93 (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

My edit on "Heidi"
I see belatedly that you reverted my edit concerning usage. "Racked with guilt" is truly the correct form. Of course it doesn't mean physically tortured; it uses the rack as a metaphor. "Wracked" means (and is a variant of) "wrecked." Please consult a usage manual, which will give a better explanation than most dictionaries. With several decades of experience editing books and other publications, I can be trusted on this one. Cognita (talk) 04:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that, I learnt something new. I see the two words can be used interchangeably (according to Oxford Online and many other sources), but "racked" is the earlier form, and more common. I grew up using "wracked", but will adjust my own usage accordingly.
 * Claidheamhmor (talk) 05:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello, I'm 98Tigerius. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hierarchy (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  •  [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]   16:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Struggling to find a good reference apart from AsianWiki. :( Claidheamhmor (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)