User talk:ClairKS

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 10:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Notifications (or lack thereof) and copyright issues
You are obviously new to Wikipedia so don't yet know how this place works.

It is not our general practice to give a heads up to any editor prior to the reversion of material that is in violation of our guidelines. While there might be some rare situations where some editors would check with another editor in advance, this is typically not required and doesn't seem at all warranted in this particular case.

It isn't even normal practice to specifically notify an editor after such a reversion. I do see that someone did give you one of our canned warnings. It is the expectation that a editor with interest in an article will include it in their watchlist which will allow the editor to see that an article is updated. See Help:Watchlist

The original reversions were done because the material was viewed as promotional. While that seems appropriate, I reverted because the material appears to be a copy of material from the company website which is almost certainly subject to copyright. (Curiously, I did not see the usual copyright notice, but all material is subject to full copyright unless explicitly licensed and I did not see evidence of an acceptable license). Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Please let me know if you need more information.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

ClairKS, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)