User talk:Clairedel1/sandbox

What does the article (or section) do well? This article does a good job of outlining all aspects of this topic, and you cover all the big areas. I think I am most interested in how they came to be an authoritarian regime, so the historical section is important. It’s also great that you use data and statistics to show how they are ranked on a global scale; this keeps it objective.

What changes would you suggest overall? Maybe you can add a section on international relations or how this regime affected their ties with other countries. You could also compare them to another authoritarian regime. And since you discuss human rights, does this affect one group specifically (i.e. women?) I am also interested in who is in power right now and who are the main political figures.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Again, I think really expanding the historical section is essential to see how Iran got to where they are today.

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? I like the current events section, and may add this to my article as well! SBrady16 (talk) 13:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

The organization for this article is great, and should give both a foundational and contemporary look at political repression in Iran. In the section about Human Rights violations, ensure that the body or works used are purely informational, as they can often be biased (rightfully so). Otherwise, a balance between historical context and contemporary significance should give you a great article, good work so far. KalebThome (talk) 14:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)